1979
DOI: 10.1107/s056773947900125x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The calculation and interpretation of high-resolution electron microscope images of lattice defects

Abstract: Limitations on the calculation of high-resolution detail in electron microscope images of defects in crystals are discussed and it is shown how images of crystals with arbitrary strain can be calculated by means of a reinterpretation of the normal dynamical equations. An alternative approach, which in some cases is preferable for numerical calculations, is the method of periodic continuation. These methods, and various approximations to them, are applied to the study of highresolution images of edge dislocatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same modified interaction constant has been used by Anstis & Cockayne (1979), and can be expressed in terms of the wave number as m/hZk~, which shows that the specimen feels not the whole wave number k but only its component k~. This result is in accord with the boundary conditions on the entrance surface, which leave the wave component kt~ parallel to the surface unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The same modified interaction constant has been used by Anstis & Cockayne (1979), and can be expressed in terms of the wave number as m/hZk~, which shows that the specimen feels not the whole wave number k but only its component k~. This result is in accord with the boundary conditions on the entrance surface, which leave the wave component kt~ parallel to the surface unchanged.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Earlier calculations have also been reported for STEM microdiffraction patterns from dislocations based on the technique of periodic continuation (Spence, 1978); however, this method is unnecessarily accurate and time consuming for present purposes, in which contrast arises from the long-range strain field of the dislocation rather than from the detailed atomic arrangement at the core. Under these conditions the appropriate approximation is the column approximation, which neglects high-angle diffuse elastic scattering from heavily strained material (Anstis & Cockayne, 1979).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this procedure it is necessary to apply the column approximation to the outer boundary of the mesh, i.e., in equation (3) ag = 1, b = 0, and cg = cp,.is calculated at the boundary using fhe column approximation. In order to avoid distortion of the image the step-size, Az, must be chosen carefully and the distance between columns (meshsize) must be sufficiently small (Anstis and Cockayne, 1979). The other method employs "free" boundary conditions defined by ag = 0, b = 1, and dc dz = 0, and which provides automatic control of the integration (e.g., the choice of Az) and provides error-estimates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%