“…There are inherent thermodynamic advantages to this process, compared to other post-combustion CCS technologies, and a number of researchers have determined that this process imposes an efficiency penalty on a power station significantly lower than that imposed by either oxyfuel combustion or MEA scrubbing, at 6-8% points, as opposed to 10 -12 points for the latter technologies. (Romeo et al, 2010, Lin et al, 2011, Daval et al, 2011, Martinez et al, 2012 One issue which has received significant attention during previous research is that the ability of CaO produced from natural limestone reduces significantly (from ~ 0.7 mol CO2/mol CaO) when it is first used to capture CO2 to a significantly lower level (~0.1 mol CO2/mol CaO) after 30 cycles of calcination and carbonation (Fennell et al, 2007a, Blamey et al, 2010a) (hereafter, the number of moles of CO2 reacted per mole of CaO will be referred to as the carrying capacity of the limestone) .…”