2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004jb003302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The calcite → aragonite transformation in low‐Mg marble: Equilibrium relations, transformation mechanisms, and rates

Abstract: [1] Experimental transformation of a rather pure natural calcite marble to aragonite marble did not proceed via the expected straightforward polymorphic replacement. Instead, the small amount of Mg in the starting material (0.36 wt %) was excluded from the growing aragonite and diffused preferentially into the remaining calcite grains, producing Mg-rich calcite rods that persisted as relicts. Nucleation of aragonite occurred exclusively on grain boundaries, with aragonite [001] oriented subparallel to calcite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inferred a Jd value was used for barometry based on the equilibrium Ab=Jd (in alkali pyroxene)+Qz and the thermodynamic data of Holland and Powell () (Figure a). The result for the Mikabu unit is consistent with the occurrence of chemically pure aragonite (Suzuki & Ishizuka, ) if the calcite=aragonite curve of Hacker, Rubie, Kirby, and Bohlen () is adopted (Figure a). The alkali pyroxene compositional data (Figure b) also suggest that the peak pressures of the low‐grade part of the Sanbagawa belt are higher than those of the Mikabu‐A unit, although aragonite has not been found in the low‐grade Sanbagawa belt possibly due to the higher T retrograde path unsuitable for the aragonite preservation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inferred a Jd value was used for barometry based on the equilibrium Ab=Jd (in alkali pyroxene)+Qz and the thermodynamic data of Holland and Powell () (Figure a). The result for the Mikabu unit is consistent with the occurrence of chemically pure aragonite (Suzuki & Ishizuka, ) if the calcite=aragonite curve of Hacker, Rubie, Kirby, and Bohlen () is adopted (Figure a). The alkali pyroxene compositional data (Figure b) also suggest that the peak pressures of the low‐grade part of the Sanbagawa belt are higher than those of the Mikabu‐A unit, although aragonite has not been found in the low‐grade Sanbagawa belt possibly due to the higher T retrograde path unsuitable for the aragonite preservation (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The alkali pyroxene compositional data (Figure b) also suggest that the peak pressures of the low‐grade part of the Sanbagawa belt are higher than those of the Mikabu‐A unit, although aragonite has not been found in the low‐grade Sanbagawa belt possibly due to the higher T retrograde path unsuitable for the aragonite preservation (e.g. Hacker et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is corroborated by the observation that eclogite minerals such as phengite and omphacite are not retrogressed when they are solely in contact with aragonite and magnesite. Assuming isothermal exhumation at 700 °C and applying the aragonite–calcite phase transition of Hacker et al. (2005), the metasomatic replacement of magnesite by aragonite is estimated to have occurred at a pressure higher than 1.9 GPa, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error ellipses indicate estimated 2σ analytical uncertainty. The diamond–graphite and coesite–quartz transitions are after Krogh‐Ravna & Terry (2004) and the position of the aragonite–calcite transition is after Hacker et al. (2005).…”
Section: P–t Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this geologically important phase transformation from Mg-calcite to aragonite is a relatively common occurrence in nature it is usually simulated in the laboratory (Hacker et al 1992(Hacker et al , 2005Lin and Huang 2004). Despite this, the step-by-step transformation is not usually studied from a morphology point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%