2017
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2017.17.1953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The C2–spectrum Tmf1(3) and its invertible modules

Abstract: We explore the C2-equivariant spectra T mf1(3) and T M F1(3). In particular, we compute their C2-equivariant Picard groups and the C2-equivariant Anderson dual of T mf1(3). This implies corresponding results for the fixed point spectra T M F0(3) and T mf0(3). Furthermore, we prove a Real Landweber exact functor theorem.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we give a brief introduction to the category of C 2 -equivariant spectra. For a more detailed discussion, one can see the appendix of [10], or for a slightly shorter introduction, see [11,Section 2].…”
Section: The C 2 -Equivariant Homotopy Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we give a brief introduction to the category of C 2 -equivariant spectra. For a more detailed discussion, one can see the appendix of [10], or for a slightly shorter introduction, see [11,Section 2].…”
Section: The C 2 -Equivariant Homotopy Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, Hill and Meier [11] introduced the notion of even and strongly even C 2equivariant spectra.…”
Section: Remark 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the original case of λ = (4, 6), the presence of strictly semistable points inside P( Λ) prevents us from obtaining a proper moduli stack compactifying the moduli stack of stable Weierstrass fibrations. On the other hand, we note that the moduli stack M 1,1 [Γ 1 (3)] of generalized elliptic curves with [Γ 1 (3)]-level structure has an isomorphism M 1,1 [Γ 1 (3)] ∼ = P(1, 3) as in [HMe,Proposition 4.5] through the equation…”
Section: Methods and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given Γ ′ ⊂ Γ ⊂ Γ 0 (n) with Γ ′ tame with respect to Z S and Γ/Γ ′ ∼ = C 2 , we can extend our previous definition by defining tmf(Γ) S as tmf(Γ ′ ) C 2 S (so e.g. tmf 0 (3) = tmf 1 (3) C 2 as in [HM17]). If Γ itself is already tame, then 2 ∈ S. One then easily computes (e.g.…”
Section: The C 2 -Equivariant Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%