1982
DOI: 10.1086/160040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The C/H ratio in Jupiter from the Voyager infrared investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, to produce an approximately 2 K offset in brightness temperature at 350 cm −1 , an error of 1 K in the instrument temperature would be required, and this same error would result in a brightness temperature error greater than 6 K at 600 cm −1 . Finally, we note that the C/H ratio in Jupiter obtained using a thermal profile directly retrieved from the IRIS spectra (Gautier et al 1982), rather than using an RSS profile, is quite close to that measured in situ by the Galileo probe (Niemann et al 1996(Niemann et al , 1998. From these considerations, it seems unlikely that errors in the IRIS absolute calibration could account for the differences observed in Fig.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For example, to produce an approximately 2 K offset in brightness temperature at 350 cm −1 , an error of 1 K in the instrument temperature would be required, and this same error would result in a brightness temperature error greater than 6 K at 600 cm −1 . Finally, we note that the C/H ratio in Jupiter obtained using a thermal profile directly retrieved from the IRIS spectra (Gautier et al 1982), rather than using an RSS profile, is quite close to that measured in situ by the Galileo probe (Niemann et al 1996(Niemann et al , 1998. From these considerations, it seems unlikely that errors in the IRIS absolute calibration could account for the differences observed in Fig.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This stems from the fact that Jupiter's CH 4 tropospheric abundance is well known, especially after the Galileo Probe measurements (Niemann et al 1998) which confirmed the Voyager 1 spectroscopic determination (Gautier et al 1982).…”
Section: Jupitermentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Least squares fits of measured absorption in the Q branch region and the R(8) manifold were made with the model and data described above. The choice of the particular R(8) manifold results from three reasons; the first is that the R branch is more adapted for the determination of A(R,R)ϭA( P, P); indeed, 3 lines within the manifolds are more closely spaced and less contaminated by transitions of other bands in the R branch than in the P branch. The second point is that important line-mixing effects ͑and thus high sensitivity to A͒ occur for high rotational quantum numbers.…”
Section: Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%