2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bystander effect in cyberbullying on social network sites: Anonymity, group size, and intervention intentions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Not performing a good action involves less moral engagement than performing the action (Gray & Wegner, 2009). That is to say, not helping the victim will not be morally judged although supportive intervention is viewed as appropriate (Doane et al, 2020; You & Lee, 2019). Thus, bystanders who feel less personal obligations to prevent cyberbullying are less willing to intervene in a cyberbullying situation (Macháčková & Pfetsch, 2016).…”
Section: Normative Influences On Bystanders’ Responses To Cyberbullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not performing a good action involves less moral engagement than performing the action (Gray & Wegner, 2009). That is to say, not helping the victim will not be morally judged although supportive intervention is viewed as appropriate (Doane et al, 2020; You & Lee, 2019). Thus, bystanders who feel less personal obligations to prevent cyberbullying are less willing to intervene in a cyberbullying situation (Macháčková & Pfetsch, 2016).…”
Section: Normative Influences On Bystanders’ Responses To Cyberbullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although knowing the devastating effects of cyberbullying on victims’ mental health, some bystanders still choose to reinforce the bully (Li, 2010; van Cleemput et al, 2014). This is because bystanders feel more impersonal in anonymous cyberspace and they are more easily influenced by their referent groups (Li, 2010; You & Lee, 2019). Therefore, pro-cyberbullying social norms may suppress the effect of personal moral standards to a certain extent.…”
Section: Normative Influences On Bystanders’ Responses To Cyberbullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the role of the bystanders and their association with the socio-affective variables in cyberbullying, the presence of greater moral disengagement, less empathy, and a lower perception of responsibility and self-efficacy is reported, since bystanders do not see the emotional response of the victim, which interferes with their evaluation of the situation (Barlińska et al, 2018;Domínguez-Hernández et al, 2018;Knauf et al, 2018). On the other hand, there are contextual variables that affect the emergence and type of behavior displayed by bystanders in the face of cyberbullying, including degree of friendship, severity of the incident, actions of other bystanders (Domínguez-Hernández et al, 2018), and whether the situation is non-anonymous (You and Lee, 2019) or those situations that occur in private (DeSmet et al, 2014;Patterson et al, 2017). The last variable is linked to personal characteristics since adolescents with greater empathy will decide to intervene regardless of whether it is in private or in public (Wang, 2020).…”
Section: The Role Of Bystanders In Cyberbullying and Its Relationship With Personal And Contextual Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whistleblowing apps should provide an easily accessible means of reporting incidents anonymously, with a lack of anonymity also being a contributing factor to the bystander effect (Schwarz & Gottlieb, 1980;You & Lee, 2019). Finally, it is important that governments and large organisations send out the right signals about modern slavery.…”
Section: Assistance/intervention Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%