2017
DOI: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-15-00057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bystander Approach to Sexual Assault Risk Reduction: Effects on Risk Recognition, Perceived Self-Efficacy, and Protective Behavior

Abstract: Several characteristics of sexual assault awareness programs for women are associated with meeting the goals of risk reduction. To date, the literature lacks an exploration of how single-sex programs affect women, particularly when they take a bystander intervention focus using women's risk recognition and avoidance as outcome measures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of The Women's Program (Foubert, 2011), a sexual assault awareness program geared toward women. Participants cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best interventions would also be focused on the perpetrator side, such as through bystander interventions or prevention initiatives (Bannon & Foubert, 2017; Coker et al, 2016; Salazar, Vivolo-Kantor, Hardin, & Berkowitz, 2014; Salazar, Vivolo-Kantor, & McGroarty-Koon, 2017). The bystander model, where members of a community (such as a university campus) are trained to actively intervene in situations where interpersonal violence is occurring, are effective in changing social norms supportive of violence in some cases (Coker et al, 2011; Gidycz, Orchowski, & Berkowitz, 2011; Salazar, Vivolo-Kantor, Hardin, & Berkowitz, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best interventions would also be focused on the perpetrator side, such as through bystander interventions or prevention initiatives (Bannon & Foubert, 2017; Coker et al, 2016; Salazar, Vivolo-Kantor, Hardin, & Berkowitz, 2014; Salazar, Vivolo-Kantor, & McGroarty-Koon, 2017). The bystander model, where members of a community (such as a university campus) are trained to actively intervene in situations where interpersonal violence is occurring, are effective in changing social norms supportive of violence in some cases (Coker et al, 2011; Gidycz, Orchowski, & Berkowitz, 2011; Salazar, Vivolo-Kantor, Hardin, & Berkowitz, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, previous research on self-protective behaviors in the face of cybervictimization has focused on adolescents and bullying; we extend this work to an age-diverse adult national sample experiencing cybervictimization. Theoretically, we expect an association between self-protective behaviors and active bystander intervention behavior, under the assumption that those who are more likely to engage in self-protective behaviors may also have a higher perceived self-efficacy for addressing threatening cybervictimization situations happening to others, but there has been very little empirical work testing these hypothesized connections (Bannon & Foubert, 2017; Banyard, 2011).…”
Section: Opportunities To Intervene and Bystander Behavior To Cybervi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observed significant effects (P=.006) for 1 other secondary outcome: bystander behavior. Although there are various effective bystander intervention programs [57][58][59][60], to our knowledge, only 1 other program has been specific to women (The Women's Program [61]); however, bystander behaviors were not assessed in the study, and it is unclear whether the program affected bystander behavior. One critique of SV risk reduction targeting women has been that effects are limited to only those women who undergo the program and that a burden is placed on women as solely responsible for avoidance of exposure to SV [62].…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%