2009
DOI: 10.1080/10911350902990304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bystander Approach: Strengths-Based Sexual Assault Prevention With At-Risk Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…McMahon and Farmer (2009) found that, among those on athletic teams, members with a closer team bond reported greater willingness to intervene.…”
Section: Social Norms Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…McMahon and Farmer (2009) found that, among those on athletic teams, members with a closer team bond reported greater willingness to intervene.…”
Section: Social Norms Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…sports teams, fraternities, residence halls) can also be key areas to build community and assess whether this contributes to increased bystander behavior. For example, McMahon and Farmer (2009) found that college athletes with a greater sense of team bonding reported a greater willingness to intervene with teammates who acted in abusive ways. However, research should also explore whether there are times that a strong sense of subgroup community may prohibit certain types of pro-social behavior.…”
Section: Sense Of Community: Research Directions For College Campusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comes from a call to not only focus on student athletes as group at-risk for committing violence, but as one that holds high leadership potential and status (McMahon, 2007;McMahon & Farmer, 2009;Moynihan, Banyard, Arnold, Eckstein, & Stapleton, 2010). A number of studies have focused on engaging athletes in bystander intervention efforts and found that bystander programs appear to be effective on positively impacting bystander attitudes and behaviors, (i.e., Foubert & Perry, 2007;Katz, Heisterkamp, & Fleming, 2011;Miller et al, 2012;Moynihan & Banyard, 2008;Moynihan et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%