2016
DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The business process management software for successful quality management and organization: case study from the University of Split School of medicine

Abstract: A precise analysis of medical school business processes allows identification of unfinished, unclear and inadequate points in these processes, and subsequently the respective improvements and increase of the QM level and ultimately a rationalization of the institution's work. Our approach offers a potential reference model for development of common QM framework allowing a continuous quality control, i.e. the adjustments and adaptation to contemporary educational needs of medical students.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 98 remaining studies, 33 were initially discarded for having little relation to the subject of study of this review. The remaining 65 papers were exhaustively analyzed and evaluated according to the described requirements; 24 papers were discarded for not having a solid experimental basis, 528 14 because they only develop the modeling of the process without executing it 29–42 and 4 of them for being other reviews. 3,4,43,44 Twenty-three studies were included in a preselection, and 11 of these were classified as doubtful by at least one of the authors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 98 remaining studies, 33 were initially discarded for having little relation to the subject of study of this review. The remaining 65 papers were exhaustively analyzed and evaluated according to the described requirements; 24 papers were discarded for not having a solid experimental basis, 528 14 because they only develop the modeling of the process without executing it 29–42 and 4 of them for being other reviews. 3,4,43,44 Twenty-three studies were included in a preselection, and 11 of these were classified as doubtful by at least one of the authors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, we propose the first guidelines establishing an academia-tailored QMS for research organizations and units, which can significantly facilitate reproducibility and reusability of scientific software and speed up technology transfer in a controlled and predictable way. Only a few research organizations have started to implement such processes ( Sapunar et al., 2016 ) yet. The developed guideline intends not to simplify the certification process but to support the manufacturer with gathering all required documentation for the certification process from the academic partners (MDx-ready).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage of BPM systems is the opportunity that they present for the study of the data generated by the system usage, which is usually registered in log files (Sapunar et al, 2016). From 3rd February to 8th July, the system automatically registered the information about all 12,974 interactions that took place.…”
Section: System Usagementioning
confidence: 99%