The association between female genital cutting and correlates of sexual and gynaecological morbidity in Edo State, Nigeria
Sir,We feel that the conclusion of Okonofua et al. 1 that female genital cutting 'did not attenuate sexual feelings' is a dangerous over-interpretation of their results.The authors do not acknowledge the difficulties inherent in gathering data on sexual pleasure. Their conclusions are based in part on responses to structured questions about frequency of orgasm and sensitivity of body parts that make many assumptions about women's understanding of sexual pleasure, anatomy and willingness to answer such questions. There is no discussion of the validity of the responses to these questions or the subtle ways in which sexual experiences might be understood and reported differently by cut and uncut women. The authors also ignore the fact that women may initiate sex for reasons other than sexual pleasure, such as in order to conceive 2 and that pressures for high fertility may be stronger among cut women. Nor do they mention the possible bias inherent in the inclusion only of women attending family planning and antenatal clinics (i.e. sexually active women).The authors describe symptoms of genital infection as 'robust' indicators of sexual activity, even while acknowledging the poor correlation between these and laboratory diagnosed conditions. Even if symptoms do give some indication of actual infection, other studies in West Africa 3 show these to consist mainly of the endogenous conditions bacterial vaginosis and candida rather than the sexually transmitted infections chlamydia or gonorrhoea. Finally, if differences between cut and uncut women in prevalences of those reporting symptoms did indicate differences in prevalence of sexually transmitted infections, this might imply differences in sexual behaviour patterns or biological susceptibility to infection but would not allow conclusions about sexual fulfilment or feelings.Therefore, while we agree that there is no suggestion from the data that cut women are less sexually active or less susceptible to genital infections or pregnancy at an early age than uncut women, the conclusion that female genital cutting does not attenuate sexual feelings does not follow.Finally, even if the conclusion that female genital cutting does not attenuate sexual feelings appears to undermine the arguments of traditional defenders of female genital cutting, it also undermines the efforts of anti-cutting advocates. Researchers in this sensitive area must be careful to interpret data objectively rather than meet advocacy needs. First, we are happy that the authors acknowledge that the relationship between female genital cutting and sexuality is an important issue to study, as part of efforts to examine the wider implications of the practice in sub-Saharan Africa. This is because the need to reduce sexual feeling and promote chastity have been shown to be the most important reasons proffered by advocates of female genital cutting in many parts of Africa. We recognise ...