2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268807008837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in Ontario, Canada, 2005–2006

Abstract: A retrospective, cross-sectional telephone survey (n=2090) was conducted in Ontario, Canada, between May 2005 and April 2006, to determine the burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in the population. The 4-week prevalence was 8.56% (95% CI 7.36-9.76); in households with more than one resident, 35% of cases reported someone else in their household had similar symptoms at the same time. The annual adjusted incidence rate was 1.17 (95% CI 0.99-1.35) episodes per person-year, with higher rates in females, rural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
54
6
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(67 reference statements)
15
54
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The exclusion rate due to non-infectious causes in our study is much higher than in most other studies; 46 % of the episodes were excluded compared to 28 . 6% in New Zealand [4], and 16 % in Ontario [15]. This high exclusion rate may be due to more restrictive exclusion criteria resulting in a lower estimate of the incidence of AG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion rate due to non-infectious causes in our study is much higher than in most other studies; 46 % of the episodes were excluded compared to 28 . 6% in New Zealand [4], and 16 % in Ontario [15]. This high exclusion rate may be due to more restrictive exclusion criteria resulting in a lower estimate of the incidence of AG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology for community surveys has improved over the years and a common case definition was established to ensure international comparability [1][2][3]. These efforts resulted in cross-sectional studies for estimates for the burden of AGI from various countries [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and additionally a few population-based cohort studies [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…laboratory confirmed but not reported to local/provincial/territorial public health and national surveillance systems) and underdiagnosis (i.e. those who do not seek medical care, sample is not submitted, tested or found positive for causative pathogen) based on data from Canadian National Studies on Acute Gastrointestinal Illness (NSAGI) population, laboratory and public health reporting surveys [38][39][40][41][42]. An alternative approach was used for estimating VTEC non-O157 cases, which is not routinely identified and reported in Canada.…”
Section: Estimating Total Illnesses Hospitalizations and Deathsmentioning
confidence: 99%