The Building of the Samaritan Temple and the Samaritan Governors – Again

Mor, Menahem; Zsengellér, József

doi:10.1515/9783110268201.89

Cited by 24 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the case of some of the identified "major sections" questions arise about the criteria used by the author to delimit them. Those who are familiar with the structure of Deuteronomy may ask, for example, about the reasons for Adamczewski to decompose the Deuteronomic Code (Deut 12-26) and divide it into three "major sections" in his monograph (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), while ignoring, for instance, the delimiting introductions to the speeches in 12:1 and 27:1. The consequence of such a breakdown of the Deuteronomic Code is the creation of a completely new rhetorical unit, Deut 11:29-12:28, the hypertextual transposition of which is the narrative about the sacrifice on Mount Moriah (Gen 22:1-10).…”

Section: Question About the Delimitation Of Literary Units In Hyperte...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Menahem Mor demonstrates Magen's mistakes in the dating of inscriptions and pottery, as well as the use of the C-14 carbon decomposition method. 23 Anne K.d.H. Gudme points out the flaws in Magen's argument for interpreting the ruins dating to the 5th century BC as an implementation of Ezekiel's temple design (Ezek 40-42).…”

Section: Question About the Delimitation Of Literary Units In Hyperte...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Question about the Hypertextual Relations in the Book of Genesis Still Open

Pikor

2024

BibAn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is a critical review of the commentary by Bartosz Adamczewski – Genesis. A Hypertextual Commentary. After presenting the theses put forward by Adamczewski in his commentary on Genesis, the criteria of sequential hypertextuality implemented by Adamczewski and his method of delimiting literary units that remain in hypertextual relations are critically reviewed. The methodological weakness of the hypertextual commentary on Genesis cannot be covered up by the creativity of the commentator.

show abstract

Section: Question About the Delimitation Of Literary Units In Hyperte...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Question About the Delimitation Of Literary Units In Hyperte...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Question about the Hypertextual Relations in the Book of Genesis Still Open

Pikor

2024

BibAn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, if we do not count the patriarchs' generations in abstract terms, but rather understand them as alluding to the sequence of the governors of the Persian province of Samaria, then, all four "generations" of the governors fall within the Persian period. 31 It is possible that the narrative traits of the Genesis characters of Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph also allude to the particular features of the governors of Samaria after Sanballat (Delaiah etc. ), but alas, we have almost no detailed historical information concerning these officials.…”

Section: F Origin and Date Of Genesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Abraham and Sanballat

Adamczewski¹

2021

Old testam. essays

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several important features of the narrative character of Abraham allude to the features of the historical person of Sanballat, the first Israelite governor of the Persian province of Samaria. The most important common features of Abraham and Sanballat are the origin in the city of Haran, a non-Yahwistic name, being related to the cult of the moon god Sin, being given the land of Israel as a hereditary possession, founding the central sanctuary of Yahweh on Mount Gerizim, and respecting an important priest from Jerusalem. These and other common features point to the origin of the book of Genesis in the secular elite of the Persian province of Samaria ca. 350-340 B.C.

show abstract

The Idea of Israel in Second Temple Judaism

Staples

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this book, Jason A. Staples proposes a new paradigm for how the biblical concept of Israel developed in Early Judaism and how that concept impacted Jewish apocalyptic hopes for restoration after the Babylonian Exile. Challenging conventional assumptions about Israelite identity in antiquity, his argument is based on a close analysis of a vast corpus of biblical and other early Jewish literature and material evidence. Staples demonstrates that continued aspirations for Israel's restoration in the context of diaspora and imperial domination remained central to Jewish conceptions of Israelite identity throughout the final centuries before Christianity and even into the early part of the Common Era. He also shows that Israelite identity was more diverse in antiquity than is typically appreciated in modern scholarship. His book lays the groundwork for a better understanding of the so-called 'parting of the ways' between Judaism and Christianity and how earliest Christianity itself grew out of hopes for Israel's restoration.

show abstract

The Building of the Samaritan Temple and the Samaritan Governors – Again

Cited by 24 publications

References 0 publications

The Question about the Hypertextual Relations in the Book of Genesis Still Open

The Question about the Hypertextual Relations in the Book of Genesis Still Open

Abraham and Sanballat

The Idea of Israel in Second Temple Judaism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About