2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1710812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Budgetary Impact of Ending Drug Prohibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Moreover, RMLs significantly free local governments from the burden of criminal justice related to marijuana law enforcement (Evans 2013). Miron (2010) estimates that nationwide marijuana legalization could reduce police service, prosecutional, judicial, and incarceration expenses by approximately $13.7 billion per year in the United States, which is roughly twice the estimate of the related tax revenue ($6.4 billion). Miron's statistics also suggest that about 68% of the budgetary savings accrue to state and local governments.…”
Section: B Major Examples Of Benefits and Costs Of Rmlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Moreover, RMLs significantly free local governments from the burden of criminal justice related to marijuana law enforcement (Evans 2013). Miron (2010) estimates that nationwide marijuana legalization could reduce police service, prosecutional, judicial, and incarceration expenses by approximately $13.7 billion per year in the United States, which is roughly twice the estimate of the related tax revenue ($6.4 billion). Miron's statistics also suggest that about 68% of the budgetary savings accrue to state and local governments.…”
Section: B Major Examples Of Benefits and Costs Of Rmlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. Miron (2010) finds that among the $48.7 billion annual budgetary savings due to legalizing drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and other drugs, $33.1 billion would accrue to state and local governments and $15.6 million to the federal government.…”
Section: B Major Examples Of Benefits and Costs Of Rmlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such measures are in scarce supply because they would need to encompass efforts at different levels of government. An exception is the work of Miron and Waldock (), who provide a rich cross‐sectional measure of the levels of state and local government spending on drug prohibition. The authors collected data on the level of police and judicial resources allocated to drug arrests in order to calculate the budgetary savings of ending drug prohibition.…”
Section: Prohibition Efforts and The Demand For Guard Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymakers trade off the social costs of addiction with the costs of enforcement when designing optimal drug policy. Costs for the enforcement of drug laws are as much as $40 billion annually in the USA (Miron and Waldock, ). The US incarceration rate per 100,000 residents grew from 100 in 1980 to 492 in 2011 as the share of prisoners convicted of drug offenses increased from 22% to 48% (Blumstein and Beck, ; Carson and Sabol, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%