Abstract:Summary. -Hantaviruses are considered to be emerging viruses due to their increasing significance as human pathogens and their cyclic reappearance during outbreaks. Central Europe is an important endemic region for hantavirus infections. Reflecting the presence of all relevant small mammals serving as reservoir hosts, close to all recognized European hantaviruses occur also in Central Europe. Important human pathogens, Puumala and Dobrava-Belgrade viruses, are present and cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syn… Show more
“…While outbreaks of HFRS have long been known to occur in central Europe (Klempa et al, 2013), including Germany (Hofmann et al, 2008; Krüger et al, 2001), the Czech Republic (Pejcoch et al, 2010) and Slovakia (Sibold et al, 1999b), reports of hantavirus infection and disease in Poland have been conspicuously uncommon, despite the existence of the same reservoir rodent species. Previously, TULV was isolated from the common vole in central Poland (Song et al, 2004), and anti-hantavirus antibodies were reported among Polish mammalogists (Sadkowska-Todys et al, 2007) and forestry workers (Grygorczuk et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies have indicated that SWSV is widespread throughout Europe and Asia across the vast distribution of its soricid reservoir, in Austria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Russia, Slovakia and Slovenia (Kang et al, 2009a; Klempa et al, 2013; Korva et al, 2013; Resman et al, 2013; Schlegel et al, 2012b). SWSV has also been detected in the Siberian large-toothed shrew ( S. daphaenodon ) and tundra shrew ( S. tundrensis ) in Russia (Yashina et al, 2010).…”
Previously, we reported the discovery of a genetically distinct hantavirus, designated Boginia virus (BOGV), in the Eurasian water shrew (Neomys fodiens), as well as the detection of Seewis virus (SWSV) in the Eurasian common shrew (Sorex araneus), in central Poland. In this expanded study of 133 shrews and 69 moles captured during 2010–2013 in central and southeastern Poland, we demonstrate the co-circulation of BOGV in the Eurasian water shrew and SWSV in the Eurasian common shrew, Eurasian pygmy shrew (Sorex minutus) and Mediterranean water shrew (Neomys anomalus). In addition, we found high prevalence of Nova virus (NVAV) infection in the European mole (Talpa europaea), with evidence of NVAV RNA in heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen and intestine. The nucleotide and amino acid sequence variation of the L segment among the SWSV strains was 0–18.8% and 0–5.4%, respectively. And for the 38 NVAV strains from European moles captured in Huta Dłutowska, the L-segment genetic similarity ranged from 94.1–100% at the nucleotide level and 96.3–100% at the amino acid level. Phylogenetic analyses showed geographic-specific lineages of SWSV and NVAV in Poland, not unlike that of rodent-borne hantaviruses, suggesting long-standing host-specific adaptation. The co-circulation and distribution of BOGV, SWSV and NVAV in Poland parallels findings of multiple hantavirus species coexisting in their respective rodent reservoir species elsewhere in Europe. Also, the detection of SWSV in three syntopic shrew species resembles spill over events observed among some rodent-borne hantaviruses.
“…While outbreaks of HFRS have long been known to occur in central Europe (Klempa et al, 2013), including Germany (Hofmann et al, 2008; Krüger et al, 2001), the Czech Republic (Pejcoch et al, 2010) and Slovakia (Sibold et al, 1999b), reports of hantavirus infection and disease in Poland have been conspicuously uncommon, despite the existence of the same reservoir rodent species. Previously, TULV was isolated from the common vole in central Poland (Song et al, 2004), and anti-hantavirus antibodies were reported among Polish mammalogists (Sadkowska-Todys et al, 2007) and forestry workers (Grygorczuk et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies have indicated that SWSV is widespread throughout Europe and Asia across the vast distribution of its soricid reservoir, in Austria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Russia, Slovakia and Slovenia (Kang et al, 2009a; Klempa et al, 2013; Korva et al, 2013; Resman et al, 2013; Schlegel et al, 2012b). SWSV has also been detected in the Siberian large-toothed shrew ( S. daphaenodon ) and tundra shrew ( S. tundrensis ) in Russia (Yashina et al, 2010).…”
Previously, we reported the discovery of a genetically distinct hantavirus, designated Boginia virus (BOGV), in the Eurasian water shrew (Neomys fodiens), as well as the detection of Seewis virus (SWSV) in the Eurasian common shrew (Sorex araneus), in central Poland. In this expanded study of 133 shrews and 69 moles captured during 2010–2013 in central and southeastern Poland, we demonstrate the co-circulation of BOGV in the Eurasian water shrew and SWSV in the Eurasian common shrew, Eurasian pygmy shrew (Sorex minutus) and Mediterranean water shrew (Neomys anomalus). In addition, we found high prevalence of Nova virus (NVAV) infection in the European mole (Talpa europaea), with evidence of NVAV RNA in heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen and intestine. The nucleotide and amino acid sequence variation of the L segment among the SWSV strains was 0–18.8% and 0–5.4%, respectively. And for the 38 NVAV strains from European moles captured in Huta Dłutowska, the L-segment genetic similarity ranged from 94.1–100% at the nucleotide level and 96.3–100% at the amino acid level. Phylogenetic analyses showed geographic-specific lineages of SWSV and NVAV in Poland, not unlike that of rodent-borne hantaviruses, suggesting long-standing host-specific adaptation. The co-circulation and distribution of BOGV, SWSV and NVAV in Poland parallels findings of multiple hantavirus species coexisting in their respective rodent reservoir species elsewhere in Europe. Also, the detection of SWSV in three syntopic shrew species resembles spill over events observed among some rodent-borne hantaviruses.
“…This fact, in addition to the recent discovery of A. flavicollis infected with the strain DOBV or DOBVAf in southeastern Europe (the Balkan region), suggests that further phylogenetic discussions on DOBV and SAAV are required [97]. Therefore, the ICTV approved SAAV and DOBV as viral species, and more recently, the hantaviruses DOBV and SAAV have been suggested to be subdivided into four related genotypes:Dobrava, Sochi, Kurkino and Saaremaa [146]. …”
Since the recognition of hantavirus as the agent responsible for haemorrhagic fever in Eurasia in the 1970s and, 20 years later, the descovery of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in the Americas, the genus Hantavirus has been continually described throughout the World in a variety of wild animals. The diversity of wild animals infected with hantaviruses has only recently come into focus as a result of expanded wildlife studies. The known reservoirs are more than 80, belonging to 51 species of rodents, 7 bats (order Chiroptera) and 20 shrews and moles (order Soricomorpha). More than 80genetically related viruses have been classified within Hantavirus genus; 25 recognized as human pathogens responsible for a large spectrum of diseases in the Old and New World. In Brazil, where the diversity of mammals and especially rodents is considered one of the largest in the world, 9 hantavirus genotypes have been identified in 12 rodent species belonging to the genus Akodon, Calomys, Holochilus, Oligoryzomys, Oxymycterus, Necromys and Rattus. Considering the increasing number of animals that have been implicated as reservoirs of different hantaviruses, the understanding of this diversity is important for evaluating the risk of distinct hantavirus species as human pathogens.
“…Hantaviral diseases have recently acquired increasing importance because of expanded spectrum of natural reservoir hosts [11][12][13][14][15]. Since there are no drugs against HTVs, vaccination remains the most desirable option for disease prevention.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.