2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36505-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The brittle-ductile transition in active volcanoes

Abstract: Contrasting deformation mechanisms precede volcanic eruptions and control precursory signals. Density increase and high uplifts consistent with magma intrusion and pressurization are in contrast with dilatant responses and reduced surface uplifts observed before eruptions. We investigate the impact that the rheology of rocks constituting the volcanic edifice has on the deformation mechanisms preceding eruptions. We propose a model for the pressure and temperature dependent brittle-ductile transition through wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we interpret the base of the seismicity to represent the depth of the brittle‐ductile transition, we can infer that the top of the zone of melt accumulation (where it is too hot for brittle failure to occur, except at very high strain rates) is below this depth (e.g., Parisio et al, ). At the neighboring Askja volcano, the maximum depth of crustal seismicity shallows from ∼8 km b.s.l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we interpret the base of the seismicity to represent the depth of the brittle‐ductile transition, we can infer that the top of the zone of melt accumulation (where it is too hot for brittle failure to occur, except at very high strain rates) is below this depth (e.g., Parisio et al, ). At the neighboring Askja volcano, the maximum depth of crustal seismicity shallows from ∼8 km b.s.l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is a first attempt to model the complex geomechanical behaviour of ESGS. Several open questions remain at present to be addressed, and future studies should focus on the influence of inelastic behaviour (rock strength decays at high temperature 70 ), on the role of geological structures and multiple faults, on the full three dimensional reservoir behaviour, on the presence of fluid mixtures (), on modelling the frictional behaviour of faults and dynamic rupture. Nevertheless, we have provided an important piece of evidence to support the role of cooling in connection to induced seismicity and fault destabilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plastic yield surface is a function of the invariants of the effective stress tensor, namely, the deviatoric (von Mises equivalent) trueboldσ˜normalD and the mean stress trueσ˜normalm, which are defined as σfalse˜m=13.1emtr.1em()trueσ˜;0.1em0.1em0.1em0.1em0.1emnormalσfalse˜D=32.2embold-italicσfalse˜D:bold-italicσfalse˜D, where truebold-italicσ˜normalD=truebold-italicσ˜tr()truebold-italicσ˜boldIfalse/3. The expression of the yield surface (Figure 1) is an extension of the Hoek‐Brown model (Grassl & Jirásek, 2006), which was previously employed to characterize the BDT of rocks (Parisio et al., 2019), and reads fp=1qnormalh()normalσfalse˜D3σc+σfalse˜mσc2+trueσ˜normalDσnormalc2+m0.2emqh2()normalσfalse˜D3σc+σfalse˜mσc<...>…”
Section: Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms that control the deformation of intact rock under shearing depend on environmental variables, such as the acting temperature, stress, and strain rate (Kato et al., 2004; Kumari et al., 2017; Odedra et al., 2001; Ohnaka, 1995; Violay et al., 2012; Wong, 1982). As temperature rises with depth, it influences the solid and fluid rheology and their interaction, and as a result the environmental effects are even more relevant in the deep part of the crust and in regions where the geothermal gradient is above average, such as volcanic areas (Parisio et al., 2019). The deformation characteristics of rocks can determine the (potential) maximum depth at which earthquakes can be expected: While several have placed the limit at 600°C (references within Molnar, 2020), evidence suggests that such a limit is likely to be arbitrary and that earthquakes could be expected in the hot crust at 800°C (Molnar, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%