1917
DOI: 10.2307/4113396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The British Species of Phomopsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1921
1921
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50), and as is customary, the Phoma type will be designated as A, the filamentous as B spores. The B form did not germinate in hanging drop, a fact supporting the statement made by Grove(10) that these may or may not be spores.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…50), and as is customary, the Phoma type will be designated as A, the filamentous as B spores. The B form did not germinate in hanging drop, a fact supporting the statement made by Grove(10) that these may or may not be spores.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Phoma cisti Brunaud, described from Cistus salvifolius in France, has minute subovoid conidia to 3 μm long ( Saccardo 1892 , p. 153), while conidia of P. cistina , described from Cistus laurifolius in Kew, England, are larger, 6–7 × 2.5 μm. The latter was combined in Phomopsis by Grove (1917) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two later homonyms Phomopsis phaseoli Grove and P. phaseoli Petch are illegitimate. One was described in Grove (1917) from stems of Phaseolous in the UK and the other in Petch (1922) from dead stems of soybean seedlings in Sri Lanka. Based on Hobbs (1985), this name is considered doubtful.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 98%