The Bristow–Latarjet procedure, a historical note on a technique in comeback

Linde, Just A. van der; Wijngaarden, Redmer van; Somford, Matthijs P.; Deurzen, Derek F.P. van; Bekerom, Michel P.J. van den

doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3704-7

Cited by 34 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Latarjet technique has proven over the years to be a very effective and reliable procedure for the surgical treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder, especially in cases of glenoid bone loss, bipolar (humeral head and anterior glenoid) bone defects, and revision of surgical failures. 1 2 3 4 Also, the introduction of subscapularis muscle split, described by Patte, improved the results concerning recovery of external rotation. 5 In 2007, Lafosse et al described the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure (arthro-Latarjet) as an alternative to traditional open surgical technique with encouraging short-term results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of Coracoid Bone Graft Placement: Open versus Arthroscopic Latarjet

Russo¹,

Grasso

Arrighi

et al. 2017

Joints

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the coracoid bone graft placement with the open Latarjet-Patte and arthroscopic Latarjet (arthro-Latarjet) procedures in the treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder. Methods Forty-six patients affected by anterior shoulder instability were divided into two groups. In group A ( n = 25), patients were operated by arthroscopic Latarjet (arthro-Latarjet) procedure and in group B ( n = 21), patients were operated by open Latarjet-Patte procedure. Instrumental investigation was based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Graft placement and integration, divergence and posterior protrusion of the screws, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis were considered as outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Positioning of the coracoid graft proved to be optimal in 76% (19/25) of patients of group A and in 100% (21/21) of patients of group B (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.025). Screw placement with respect to the glenoid surface showed a posterior divergence in 44% (11/25) of patients in group A and in 24% (5/21) of patients in group B ( p = 0.15). Posterior protrusion of screw was observed in 76% (19/25) of patients in group A and 71.4% (15/21) of patients in group B ( p = 0.73). Graft integration was present in 76% (19/25) of patients in group A and 85.7% (18/21) of patients in group B (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.48). Mild signs of glenohumeral osteoarthritis were observed in 12% (3/25) of patients in group A and 28.6% (6/21) of patients in group B (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.26). Conclusion Patients operated with open Latarjet-Patte procedure showed better results than those of the arthro-Latarjet group in reference to the positioning of the graft on the coronal plane ( p = 0.025). No significant differences between the groups were observed for graft integration, divergence of the screws, posterior protrusion of the screws, and osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence Level II, nonrandomized prospective comparative study.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of Coracoid Bone Graft Placement: Open versus Arthroscopic Latarjet

Russo¹,

Grasso

Arrighi

et al. 2017

Joints

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Any glenoid bone lesion is an important risk factor for recurrence of glenohumeral dislocations, and isolated capsulolabral repair has higher recurrence rates than bone transfer surgeries in these patients; the larger the glenoid bone defect, the higher the risk. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modified Bristow-Latarjet procedure for treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation

Moura

Reis

Ferreira

et al. 2018

Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveRetrospective case–control study of authors experience in the modified Bristow-Latarjet procedure for treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation with glenoid bone injury.MethodsSample with 102 recurrent glenohumeral dislocation cases submitted to modified Bristow-Latarjet procedure. Indications included situations of recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability with more than two dislocation episodes and with glenoid bone attritional or fragmentary injuries, without possibility of reconstruction. Mean follow-up time was 5.33 ± 2.74 years (minimum 1; range 1–13).ResultsThe mean Walch-Duplay Score at the last evaluation was 91.23 ± 11.46 (range 15–100). The functional score of patients with glenoid bone loss greater than 20% did not show a significant difference in comparison with patients with glenoid bone loss lower than 20% (90 vs. 92, respectively). The functional score also did not show a significant difference between sports practice categories and between recreational and competitive practice, being excellent (greater than 90) in every category. There were no dislocation recurrences and the only complications were a case of persistent instability and a screw revision. Mild glenohumeral osteoarthrosis imaging signs were identified in 7.84% of the patients; however, their functional scores were not significantly different in comparison to other patients.ConclusionThe modified Bristow-Latarjet procedure is a very effective procedure with few complications in the medium-term, showing very satisfactory functional outcomes in the treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation associated with glenoid bone injury.

show abstract

“…Then, in addition to labrum repair, they should consider the options of anterior glenoid reconstruction by means of coracoid transfer (i.e. the Bristow and Latarjet procedures) 31 or iliac bone grafting 32 as well as humeral head reconstruction using the remplissage procedure 33 or by transplantation. 34 The number of complications that patients experience could be used in evaluating the safety of a method.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Freedman et al 3 reported that there were no significant 2 Coracoid process transfers like the Bristow and Latarjet procedures are recommended for patients at high risk for recurrent instability and lead to favorable outcomes in the short term. 31 Practitioners should still be cautious regarding the long-term outcomes, because these require performing nonanatomical reconstruction procedures on young patients. Regardless of which procedure is performed, the treatment should follow the guidelines advocated by Rowe: anatomic dissection at the time of surgery, identification and repair of the lesions responsible for the instability, returning tissues to their anatomic locations, and early postoperative ROM.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus arthroscopic Bankart repair without augmentations for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A prospective study

Uchiyama

Handa

Shimpuku

et al. 2017

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability has some advantages (including short surgical time, less morbidity, less postoperative pain, reduced hospitalization time, and decreased risk of complications) compared with open procedures. We performed a prospective study comparing open repair with arthroscopic repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The aim was to clarify the relative effectiveness of open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift (OBRICS) and arthroscopic Bankart (AB) repair without augmentations with approximately 5 years of follow-up. Methods: We investigated 32 shoulders of 30 patients (24 men and 6 women) undergoing OBRICS (15 shoulders of 17 patients; two patients were bilateral) and AB (15 shoulders of 15 patients). The average follow-up was 5 years and 2.5 months (range: 60-66 months). The clinical evaluation included recurrent instability rate, range of motion, and postoperative rehabilitation. All patients were assessed using the scoring systems of Rowe and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) preoperatively and during the final evaluation. Results: Recurrent instability rates were significantly different between the OBRICS (0%) and AB (26.6%) groups (p ¼ 0.022). There were fewer limitations of external rotation (ER), ER at 90 abduction, and horizontal extension for AB than for OBRICS postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean Rowe and UCLA scores for both methods were not significantly different at final follow-up. Conclusion: Our data suggest that OBRICS leads to a lower rate of recurrent instability. However, those with AB had fewer ER and horizontal extension limitations.

show abstract

The Bristow–Latarjet procedure, a historical note on a technique in comeback

Cited by 34 publications

References 35 publications

Accuracy of Coracoid Bone Graft Placement: Open versus Arthroscopic Latarjet

Accuracy of Coracoid Bone Graft Placement: Open versus Arthroscopic Latarjet

Modified Bristow-Latarjet procedure for treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus arthroscopic Bankart repair without augmentations for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A prospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About