2000
DOI: 10.1086/313302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bright SHARC Survey: The Cluster Catalog

Abstract: We present the Bright SHARC (Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster) Survey, which is an objective search for serendipitously detected extended X-ray sources in 460 deep ROSAT PSPC pointings. The Bright SHARC Survey covers an area of 178.6 sq.deg and has yielded 374 extended sources. We discuss the X-ray data reduction, the candidate selection and present results from our on-going optical follow-up campaign. The optical follow-up concentrates on the brightest 94 of the 374 extended sources and is n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
155
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
9
155
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The SHARC Bright (Bright Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster survey, Romer et al 2000a) is a wide area shallow survey covering a total area of 178.6 deg 2 with a flux limit of 1.63 × 10 −13 erg s −1 cm −2 . The SHARC Southern (The Southern Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster survey, Burke et al 2003a) is a narrow area deep survey covering 17.7 deg 2 with a flux limit of 4.66 × 10 −14 erg s −1 cm −2 .…”
Section: Sharc Bright and Sharc Southernmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SHARC Bright (Bright Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster survey, Romer et al 2000a) is a wide area shallow survey covering a total area of 178.6 deg 2 with a flux limit of 1.63 × 10 −13 erg s −1 cm −2 . The SHARC Southern (The Southern Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster survey, Burke et al 2003a) is a narrow area deep survey covering 17.7 deg 2 with a flux limit of 4.66 × 10 −14 erg s −1 cm −2 .…”
Section: Sharc Bright and Sharc Southernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the input catalogues this information is usually provided as notes and comments and because it is different in type and size from catalogue to catalogue its homogenisation is not straightforward. In general, we choose not to include detailed and extended information and we therefore refer the reader to the cited papers for more information, e.g., the notes to Table 1 in Gioia & Luppino (1994) or in Table 2 of Romer et al (2000a). In the following we describe the type of information we included in NOTES.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of our search for moderately distant (i.e., z ∼ 1) clusters of galaxies that are detectable via their X-ray emission (Adami et al 2000;Romer et al 2000;Ulmer et al 2005;Adami et al 2007), we report here the discovery of a cluster with z = 0.866, RX J1257.2+4738 (hereafter for brevity referred to as RX J1257). The cluster was first detected in X-rays in the ROSAT data archive, and the i -band and Ks-band followup found a concentration of red galaxies that could be explained by the existence of a cluster with z > ∼ 0.6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Planck survey is the first all-sky cluster survey since the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) of the early 1990s. The ROSAT dataset produced several reference catalogs either directly based on the RASS, among which NORAS (Northern ROSAT All-Sky galaxy cluster survey, Böhringer et al 2000), REFLEX (ROSAT-ESO Flux Limited X-ray Galaxy Cluster Survey, Böhringer et al 2004) and MACS (Massive Cluster Survey, Ebeling et al 2001), or serendipitous catalogs, such as the 400 sd (400 Square Degree 1 http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Planck/index.html survey, Burenin et al 2007), the SHARC surveys (Serendipitous High-Redshift Archival ROSAT Cluster survey, Romer et al 2000;Burke et al 2003) or the WARPS surveys (Wide Angle ROSAT Pointed Survey, Perlman et al 2002;Horner et al 2008). A comprehensive description of these surveys can be found in Piffaretti et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%