1961
DOI: 10.1080/0015587x.1961.9717293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Breaking of Objects as a Funerary Rite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
6

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In Greece, the mythical ferryman of the dead, Charon, depicted on many Athenian lekythoi of the fifth century BC, survived and transformed in medieval and later times as Charos, the god of death who rules over Hades (Sullivan ). Practices such as the singing of laments, the pouring of libations, drinking toasts to the dead, eating funerary meals together, and smashing vessels, as well as removing, washing, and re‐interring remains from their original place of deposition, can be found in Late Bronze Age, Archaic and Classical times, and some into the modern period (Astrom ; Grinsell , 482; Pentaris ; Politis ; Vermeule ). These practices have survived changes in the form of disposal of the body, as well as ideological, political, social and religious transformations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Greece, the mythical ferryman of the dead, Charon, depicted on many Athenian lekythoi of the fifth century BC, survived and transformed in medieval and later times as Charos, the god of death who rules over Hades (Sullivan ). Practices such as the singing of laments, the pouring of libations, drinking toasts to the dead, eating funerary meals together, and smashing vessels, as well as removing, washing, and re‐interring remains from their original place of deposition, can be found in Late Bronze Age, Archaic and Classical times, and some into the modern period (Astrom ; Grinsell , 482; Pentaris ; Politis ; Vermeule ). These practices have survived changes in the form of disposal of the body, as well as ideological, political, social and religious transformations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition of the artefacts and the level of fragmentation led the excavators to suggest that the secondary burial deposit had been disturbed by later activity, and in support of this they cited the discovery of medieval pottery and a clay pipe on top of the mound. Whilst this is a plausible explanation, it is also the case that finds of broken objects and fragmented pottery (Grinsell ; Fowler , appendix B) are well documented in northern England, as well as at other Early Bronze Age barrow sites across Britain (for example, Jones ; Woodward and Hunter ), and is possible that their condition was not due to later disturbance, but that they may instead have been deposited as worn objects, having been heirlooms, for example (Woodward ; Jones , 237). The position of the axe‐hammer just below the ground surface and the weathered condition of the hammer end suggest that some erosion of the top of the barrow had taken place.…”
Section: The 1937 Excavation and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…avant J.-C. a livré un pot à solides et une cruche dont le bec présente une fracture en « V » et dont l'anse est absente (Le Brézet à Clermont-Ferrand : fouilles inédites G. Vernet, étude F. Blaizot) . Enfin, de nombreux parallèles peuvent être trouvés dans la littérature ethnologique, correspondant à autant d'explications ou presque de cette pratique (Grinsell, 1961 ;Maertens, 1979, p. 110-118) jusque chez les Pygmées qui ébrèchent des vases avant de les déposer dans les tombes (Leroy, in : Alihanga, 1979, p. 277) et chez les Inuits qui les percent de manière à éviter qu'ils soient récupérés par les vivants pour leur usage personnel (Saladin-d'Anglure, 1999).…”
Section: Synthèseunclassified