2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The breakdown of the word symmetry in the human genome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well symmetric for its frequency framework in terms of at least mononucleotides. The symmetry index based on the L 1 distance (Baisnée et al, 2002; calculated as 1 À S 1 in Afreixo et al (2013)) for mononucleotides is 0.9831 for this sequence. The value of the symmetry index is sufficiently high because the highfrequency mononucleotides (A and T) are perfectly symmetric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is well symmetric for its frequency framework in terms of at least mononucleotides. The symmetry index based on the L 1 distance (Baisnée et al, 2002; calculated as 1 À S 1 in Afreixo et al (2013)) for mononucleotides is 0.9831 for this sequence. The value of the symmetry index is sufficiently high because the highfrequency mononucleotides (A and T) are perfectly symmetric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The results of Qi and Cuticchia (2001) would not be conclusive because only some pairs of complementary decanucleotides were analyzed. Afreixo et al (2013) analyzed the word symmetry (strand symmetry) in the human genome in terms of mononucleotides through decanucleotides. They performed an extensive survey, analyzing the situations of all the complementary oligonucleotide pairs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been several papers in the past that have verified this symmetry for different values of k for more than 700 different species [1] [2] [12] [16] [17]. Given a genome of length n, the k-limit or the value of k upto which the 2nd Chargaff rule holds was empirically observed to be about 0.7 ln n [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%