2018
DOI: 10.7903/cmr.18581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Brand Authenticity Scale: Development and Validation

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to develop a brand authenticity scale by reviewing the relevant literature to identify the factors important for brand authenticity, then developing and testing the discriminant and convergent validity of measurement scales for dimensions of brand authenticity. The research method adopted includes in-depth interview and focus group interview. The procedure for scale development was: item generation, scale purification, and scale validation. This research uses qualitative and empiri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, because of lacking the previous empirical research on what brand authenticity is and its effects, the brand authenticity scale was empirically developed (Tran, 2018). Moreover, the six dimensions represent the most comprehensive understanding of brand authenticity.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, because of lacking the previous empirical research on what brand authenticity is and its effects, the brand authenticity scale was empirically developed (Tran, 2018). Moreover, the six dimensions represent the most comprehensive understanding of brand authenticity.…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three broad goals are identified (control, connection, and virtue) that drive the systematic selection and evaluation of different consumption experiences as being inauthentic. Tran and Keng (2018) used qualitative and empirical methods to identify the six key dimensions of brand authenticity and develop a brand authenticity scale. As a result, a six-dimensional scale containing seventeen items was developed representing distinctive dimensions of brand authenticity: virtue, connection, realism, aesthetics, control, and originality.…”
Section: Introduction 1920mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traceability and identification are crucial for marketing food products. When food goods are segregated via process and/or content attributes of credence, auditing, recordkeeping, and validation are acknowledged as important aspects of their confirmation for the "preservation of culture" and the "management of authenticity" (Tran & Keng, 2018).…”
Section: Threat Of Losing Authenticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural iconic branding of the MMI can deliver unexpected cultural value, as this branding applies the nation's joint concerns and wishes. Brands tend to be culturally iconic when they carry within them identity myths which are no more than simple fictions that highlight cultural anxieties from the distance found in fictional worlds rather than the real-world problems that consumers face in their day-to-day lives (Tran & Keng, 2018). The issues and concerns raised by these myths are simply imaginative and not the actual image of the targeted demographics' aspired identities (Sarker et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Promote Cultural Iconic Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the brand authenticity scale developed by Tran and Keng (2018) was used. The scale consists of six dimension and 18 items.…”
Section: Değerlendirme Ve Sonuçmentioning
confidence: 99%