“…Although certain procedural changes in the survey such as a random visiting pattern and incorporation of multiple readings at several stations within the grid would improve the reliability of such surveys considerably and allow more definitive statements concerning meter resolution, it is still apparent that additional resolution is required. The range of corrected readings obtained was about 500 microgals, a value which is very large in a relative sense, and cannot be reasonably attributed to regional gradients (Woodward and Joestring, 1964) or underground cavities. For instance, assuming a cavity at a depth of 75 feet, a radius of 15 feet, and a density contrast of 2.0, the following formula may be used to calculate a theoretical anomaly of about 10 microgals for a cavity similar to the one penetrated in well 0-2. war* where :…”