2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00760.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Botanist Effect Revisited: Plant Species Richness, County Area, and Human Population Size in the United States

Abstract: The "botanist effect" is thought to be the reason for higher plant species richness in areas where botanists are disproportionately present as an artefactual consequence of a more thorough sampling. We examined whether this was the case for U.S. counties. We collated the number of species of vascular plants, human population size, and the area of U.S. counties. Controlling for spatial autocorrelation and county area, plant species richness increased with human population size and density in counties with and w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
55
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
55
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlikely, given the quality of the Fauna Europaea project (Fontaine et al 2007), and given the generality of the species-people relationship for many other taxa and regions. Moreover, it has been shown for birds in Britain and vascular plants in USA that such a sampling argument may not explain observed positive species-people relationships (Evans et al 2007;Pautasso and McKinney 2007), although the available data do not allow similar analyses for aphids. Sampling eVort might actually be greater in smaller countries, but these are the countries with lower human population size, and this eVect might compensate any higher survey eVort in countries with higher human population size due to a larger presence of taxonomists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is unlikely, given the quality of the Fauna Europaea project (Fontaine et al 2007), and given the generality of the species-people relationship for many other taxa and regions. Moreover, it has been shown for birds in Britain and vascular plants in USA that such a sampling argument may not explain observed positive species-people relationships (Evans et al 2007;Pautasso and McKinney 2007), although the available data do not allow similar analyses for aphids. Sampling eVort might actually be greater in smaller countries, but these are the countries with lower human population size, and this eVect might compensate any higher survey eVort in countries with higher human population size due to a larger presence of taxonomists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, sampling bias does not appear to explain the observed species-people correlation for birds in Britain and for plants in the USA (Evans et al 2007;Pautasso and McKinney 2007). Similarly, the flora of German urban areas is believed to be naturally species-rich (Kühn et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The most common ways to collect data on species diversity distributions are intensive ground surveys or inventories of species in the field. However, the expense and time required for such studies make it difficult, or even impractical, to expect that all potential sites for biodiversity conservation can be inventoried in a timely fashion (Moerman andEstabrook 2006, Pautasso andMcKinney 2007). In addition, consistency of results of ground-based biodiversity surveys is often difficult to achieve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%