2017
DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1402202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Boomerang Effect” of Kin-state Activism: Cross-border Ties and the Securitization of Kin Minorities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their members who live in two or more different states, often have different or multiple citizenship, are subject to different nationalizing processes and policies, and can be variously integrated or excluded from the states where they live. Often, such groups form minorities in one state, but have also a 'kin-state', or an 'external homeland', where their co-ethnics form a core nation (King and Melvin 2000, Liebich 2017, Kaiser and Nikiforova 2006. Transborder ethnic groups can be found all over the world, but the phenomenon has become particularly politicized, and at times securitized, in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, where the state borders that emerged after the disintegration of empires and multinational states often aspired to represent ethnic distributions of populations, but generally failed to do so (Liebich 2017).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their members who live in two or more different states, often have different or multiple citizenship, are subject to different nationalizing processes and policies, and can be variously integrated or excluded from the states where they live. Often, such groups form minorities in one state, but have also a 'kin-state', or an 'external homeland', where their co-ethnics form a core nation (King and Melvin 2000, Liebich 2017, Kaiser and Nikiforova 2006. Transborder ethnic groups can be found all over the world, but the phenomenon has become particularly politicized, and at times securitized, in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, where the state borders that emerged after the disintegration of empires and multinational states often aspired to represent ethnic distributions of populations, but generally failed to do so (Liebich 2017).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, such groups form minorities in one state but have also a “kin-state,” or an “external homeland,” where their co-ethnics form a core nation (King and Melvin 2000; Liebich 2019; Kaiser and Nikiforova 2006). Transborder ethnic groups can be found all over the world, but the phenomenon has become particularly politicized, and at times securitized, in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, where the state borders that emerged after the disintegration of empires and multinational states often aspired to represent ethnic distributions of populations but generally failed to do so (Liebich 2019). As a result, many borderlands in the region are populated with such groups, who often have competing national narratives and images of the homeland with the core nation.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, Hungary aims to supersede the neighboring countries' sovereign power with this principle to access its kin communities in the neighboring countries and does not hesitate to use the EU's institutions against its neighbors. Therefore, the implementation of this principle results in severe tensions between Hungary and Slovakia and Romania in the context of sovereignty (Bauböck, 2010;Liebich, 2017). For example, when the-then Hungarian president László Sólyom's plan to visit the Slovak town of Komárno for a ceremony inaugurating a statue of Saint Stephen (the founder and first king of the Hungarian State) in 2012 was prevented by Slovakia, Hungary brought this issue before the European Court of Justice with the claim that Slovakia infringed the principle of free movement (European Commission, 2012).…”
Section: The Hungarian Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when the-then Hungarian president László Sólyom's plan to visit the Slovak town of Komárno for a ceremony inaugurating a statue of Saint Stephen (the founder and first king of the Hungarian State) in 2012 was prevented by Slovakia, Hungary brought this issue before the European Court of Justice with the claim that Slovakia infringed the principle of free movement (European Commission, 2012). The Slovak-Hungarian relationship also deteriorated through nationalist trans-border activism (Liebich, 2017). To illustrate, a diplomatic tension arose when the Slovak police detained 28 Hungarians who visited the Slovak town of Král'ovský Chlmec to commemorate the 17th anniversary of the First Vienna Award of 1938, through which a part of southern Slovakia was given to Hungary by Nazi Germany.…”
Section: The Hungarian Casementioning
confidence: 99%