2019
DOI: 10.3390/rel10020077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Book of Job as a Thought Experiment: On Science, Religion, and Literature

Abstract: This paper presents a philosophical critique of the proposal that the Book of Job is a theological thought experiment about divine providence. Eight possible objections are entertained. They guide the discussion of the proposal. It is concluded that the proposal has more merits than perils.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since that belief and many of the religiosity factors associated with it are also associated with negative health outcomes, those holding said belief may be at risk for poorer health. We acknowledge that faith traditions have good reasons for reinforcing the importance of wholesome behavior in their followers, and that illness may be used by a Higher Power to discipline, refine, or test believers in some circumstances (see, for example, the story of Job from the Biblical and Quranic texts) (Fehige, 2019). The scientific method cannot disprove (or prove) the existence of a higher metaphysical reality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that belief and many of the religiosity factors associated with it are also associated with negative health outcomes, those holding said belief may be at risk for poorer health. We acknowledge that faith traditions have good reasons for reinforcing the importance of wholesome behavior in their followers, and that illness may be used by a Higher Power to discipline, refine, or test believers in some circumstances (see, for example, the story of Job from the Biblical and Quranic texts) (Fehige, 2019). The scientific method cannot disprove (or prove) the existence of a higher metaphysical reality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From his point of view, it is only possible to recognize that "the sorts of narratives that we typically treat as literary fictions can be used in thought experiments" (Egan 2016, p. 141) without arriving at an identification between thought experiments and literary fictions. 10 To clarify the way in which a thought experiment, in the theological sphere, allows for reflection on different aspects of human reality, see Fehige (2019). Here, the author analyses the possibility of considering the Book of Job as a theological thought experiment on divine providence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we shall see in this second part of the paper, it is possible, bearing in mind the indirect link between thought and action in the face of theological questions, to recognize the cognitive value of the theological thought experiment, especially if we consider the narrative function of the thought experiment and the relationship of unity, on the one hand, and distinction, on the other, between theological and literary thought experiments (cf. Fehige 2009aFehige , 2009bFehige , 2011Fehige , 2012Fehige , 2019Fehige and Stuart 2014;Stuart et al 2018). The art of narration can be understood as a means by which, in theology, as in fiction, the ability to imagine possible scenarios succeeds in exerting an indirect or reflexive influence on our lived experience.…”
Section: The Role Of the Thought Experiments In A Revealed Theologymentioning
confidence: 99%