The previous chapters have examined the way in which ideas of landscape and the construction of particular kinds of buildings and spaces, such as the homes of enslaved laborers and clove-drying floors, were constituent parts of the social relations of slavery and capitalist formations. Zooming in to a smaller scale of analysis, this chapter takes up the archaeology of households to examine capitalist formations, power dynamics, gender and sexuality, and newly emergent identities on nineteenth-century clove plantations. Archaeological data are central to these interpretations, and I draw heavily on material from my fieldwork on Zanzibar to explore these topics. On Zanzibar, the plantation owner did not simply construct a landscape. They brought together what we might usefully think of as a household; a grouping of individuals who lived on land demarcated as a part of the plantation, more or less articulated into a unit. Finding language to describe the main residential core of the plantation is difficult. Historical studies of Zanzibari plantations have highlighted the fact that a form of social unit was created on plantations, but these are certainly not coterminous with the idea of a single family. As a further complication to this analysis, these social units were also variable:The groups into which slaveowners brought their slaves were by no means uniform. The imagery…was patriarchal, but the structure was not that of a family or kinship group. A wealthy individual often included slaves-along with poorer kinsmen, clients, and othersin his personal entourage. Plantation agriculture rooted such groups in the owner's land and in a differentiated economic organization. (Cooper 1977, pp. 213-214)