1997
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1nq7b4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bonds of Womanhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
52
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…8 The first distinction, the nei-wai polarity, designates the separated domains between both genders: the males are primary in the outer (social/public) sphere while the females are primary in the inner (domestic) sphere. The modern ideology of separate spheres, which means man as economic provider and woman as emotional caregiver, also appeared among Western middle-class families during the Industrial Revolution and continued even after women's increasing employment (Cott 1997;Hochschild and Machung 2012). Despite its universality, the gender distinction in the Confucian tradition puts an extra emphasis on men's and women's social roles in families, working together to continue the bloodline through reproduction.…”
Section: Confucianism and Its Psycho-cultural Impetusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The first distinction, the nei-wai polarity, designates the separated domains between both genders: the males are primary in the outer (social/public) sphere while the females are primary in the inner (domestic) sphere. The modern ideology of separate spheres, which means man as economic provider and woman as emotional caregiver, also appeared among Western middle-class families during the Industrial Revolution and continued even after women's increasing employment (Cott 1997;Hochschild and Machung 2012). Despite its universality, the gender distinction in the Confucian tradition puts an extra emphasis on men's and women's social roles in families, working together to continue the bloodline through reproduction.…”
Section: Confucianism and Its Psycho-cultural Impetusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…American women have always been working as gardeners, seamstresses, and nurses, etc., contributing to the establishment of family economy and the development of American industrial capitalism. Yet, before the nineteenth century, the prevalent myth held that women did not work, though the housekeeper and domestic manufacturer had lamented that "A woman's work is never done" 8 . As Linda Gordon revealed, definitions of "work" as wage labor and of "working class" as miners, construction workers, and factory hands-characteristic laborers of industrial society, are to be revised, if "women's work" is recognized as indispensable for understanding the impact of industrialism and the consumerist economy 9 .…”
Section: Domestic Implications Of American "Women's Work"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, women were prescribed to follow the ideology of "true womanhood" 1 and economic position in the family and society. Nevertheless, since "the mill girl" began to join the industrial work and "the lady" made her debut in 1830s, American women's economic participation, public activities, and social visibility have been changing women's reception to the "cult of domesticity", their material life circumstances, and long-range economic situation 2 . In this process, the recognition of consumers' social status also transformed women's familial, docile roles into autonomous, public citizens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although what women did in the home had economic import, the home was described as a non -economic space, separate from the tumultuous world of business and government. Women ' s primary function was to create peaceful and virtuous homes in which they would nurture young Christians, train good citizens, and offer refuge from the competitive male sphere (Boydston, 1990 ;Cott, 1977 ;McDannell, 1986 ).…”
Section: The Nineteenth Century: Domesticity and Separate Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%