There have been few analyses of the fat, protein and carbohydrate fractions in zooplankton, and owing to the difficulty of sorting large numbers of single species, the majority of the earlier determinations were necessarily carried out on mixed zooplankton hauls (Brandt, 1898;Brandt & Raben, 1919;Moberg, 1926;Wimpenny, 1929;Drummond & Gunther, 1934;Vinogradov, 1953). Most of these analyses suggested a relatively high protein and fat content, and this was confirmed by Orr (1934 a), who investigated the chemical composition of a single species, Calanus finmarchicus. Orr's result gave fat, protein and chitin as 20-40,35-5°and 3 %, respectively of dry weight. Similar high values were also reported by Orr (1934b) for Euchaeta norvegica. The carbohydrate content was not, however, estimated in either of Orr's investigations since large numbers of animals would have been required. Brandt (1898), after analysing mixed plankton hauls which were predominantly copepods, suggested a carbohydrate content of ca. 20 %.Although many workers have suggested that fat is used as substrate during the respiration of zooplankton, the role of carbohydrate is doubtful, since, there is so little information on the glycogen content and on the amount of monosaccharides in plankton animals. Lane, Posner & Greenfield (1952) and Greenfield (1953) reported very high glycogen values in prenatal larvae of Teredo, and noted a sharp reduction in the amount in free-swimming larvae. Collyer (1957) found the glycogen reserves in the larvae of Ostrea edulis to lie between 13'4 and 15'4 % of the dry organic matter, but found no correlation with size. It therefore appeared highly desirable to investigate the total carbohydrate content (i.e. glycogen and monosaccharides) in certain planktonic animals. It also was of interest to test whether the amount of carbohydrate varied with feeding and activity, since this might indicate whether carbohydrate was normally used as an energy source.
MATERIAL AND METHODSExperiments were carried out with Calanus finmarchicus (Gunnerus)l and Neomysis integer (J. V. Thompson) at Plymouth, and with Pleurobrachia pileus (0. F. Muller) at Southampton. In each case the animals were picked 1 It is likely that since these specimens were collected in the English Channel they should be referred to the variety helgolandicus.