2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The blender effect: Physical state of food influences healthiness perceptions and consumption decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research also found a link between physical state and perceived healthiness. In contrast to Szocs and Lefebvre (30), who argue that the blender effect is “linear” when they investigated the effect of physical state on perceived healthiness and calorie content (more processed means less healthy and higher calories), we concur with Gmuer et al (29) in arguing that the relationship between physical state and acceptance is much more complex. We found a few examples of where higher levels of processing did not necessarily result in higher greater levels of acceptance, e.g., concentrated extracts would be accepted if they offered a benefit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our research also found a link between physical state and perceived healthiness. In contrast to Szocs and Lefebvre (30), who argue that the blender effect is “linear” when they investigated the effect of physical state on perceived healthiness and calorie content (more processed means less healthy and higher calories), we concur with Gmuer et al (29) in arguing that the relationship between physical state and acceptance is much more complex. We found a few examples of where higher levels of processing did not necessarily result in higher greater levels of acceptance, e.g., concentrated extracts would be accepted if they offered a benefit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…However, it is not only the physical form that influences perceptions but also the processes used to create the product. Using mechanical processing, Szocs and Lefebvre (30) find that perceived healthiness is influenced not only by the physical state but also by the degree of processing suggested by the physical state. Gmuer et al (29) who explore consumer responses to crickets presented as (1) flour, (2) deep-fried bits, (3) a snack mix comprising bits mixed with tortilla chips, and (4) deep-fried whole crickets, found that the degree of processing influenced willingness to eat insects.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance/rejection Of Foodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nature imagery seems to be used more for health products in Denmark, but not in the United States. Previous studies suggest that products carrying natural claims are perceived to be less caloric (Lee, Shimizu, Kniffin, & Wansink, ) and even that images depicting nature could prompt consumers to infer that the product is healthier (Chrysochou & Grunert, ; Gvili et al, ; Machiels & Karnal, ), whereas images of products presented at a less natural stage (e.g., blended or processed) make the product appear less healthy and higher in calories (Szocs & Lefebvre, ). On the other hand, overall health‐related imagery seems to be used more for health products in the United States, but not in Denmark.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of quality and healthiness as key drivers for consumer choice and for driving sustainability strategies is discussed in the literature (e.g., Szocs & Lefebvre, 2016;Trienekens & Zuurbier, 2008). However, the role of innovation for sustainability to improve food quality and healthiness is scarcely studied.…”
Section: Research Questions and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%