2008
DOI: 10.1086/591438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Blast Wave Model for AGN Feedback: Effects on AGN Obscuration

Abstract: We compute the effect of the galactic absorption on AGN emission in a cosmological context by including a physical model for AGN feeding and feedback in a semi-analytic model of galaxy formation. This is based on galaxy interactions as triggers for AGN accretion, and on expanding blast waves as a mechanism to propagate outwards the AGN energy injected into the interstellar medium at the center of galaxies. We first test our model against the observed number density of AGNs with different intrinsic luminosity a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
295
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
13
295
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We span a 2 orders of magnitude range in L(AGN) (10 45 -10 47 erg s −1 ) and no clear trend between these two quantities is seen in these data. This result is at odds with the results recently presented in , where a trend of the [OIII] width with the IR luminosity is seen in SDSS luminous Type 2 quasars, as expected for outflows driven by the radiation pressure of the quasar (e.g., Menci et al 2008). …”
Section: Type 2 Agn Samplescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We span a 2 orders of magnitude range in L(AGN) (10 45 -10 47 erg s −1 ) and no clear trend between these two quantities is seen in these data. This result is at odds with the results recently presented in , where a trend of the [OIII] width with the IR luminosity is seen in SDSS luminous Type 2 quasars, as expected for outflows driven by the radiation pressure of the quasar (e.g., Menci et al 2008). …”
Section: Type 2 Agn Samplescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While among less luminous sources (L bol < 10 45 erg s −1 ), nuclear activity and Star Formation (SF) can be regulated by local processes such as accretion triggered gas inflows or disk instabilities likely induced by minor mergers or galaxies encounters (see Ciotti & Ostriker 2007;Bournaud et al 2011;Cen 2012), among the most luminous sources (L bol > 10 46 erg s −1 ), major galaxy mergers are indicated as the culprit for such physical coupling, since they can efficiently funnel a large amount of gas into the nuclear region to feed (and obscure) the accreting SMBH (Menci et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, unobscured AGN should be associated to galaxies with low or absent episodes of star-formation, given that most of the gas and dust responsible for the star formation has been blown away by the effect of AGN feedback. Many observational evidences (see Alexander et al 2005;Page et al 2004;Stevens et al 2006) and theoretical arguments (Menci et al 2008, and references therein) in favor of the evolutionary sequence do exist. These results challenge our 20-years old AGN view, in which the differences we see in different classes of sources -especially between "obscured" and "unobscured" ones -are simply due to orientations effects (Antonucci et al 1985;Antonucci 2003;Urry & Padovani 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even more important, ⋆ E-mail: roberto.dellaceca@brera.inaf.it there are now increasing evidence that the formation and growth of galaxies and their nuclear supermassive black holes (SMBHs, M BH > 10 6 M ⊙ ) are intimately related; feedback from actively accreting SMBH, AGN, must play a fundamental role in regulating both star formation and accretion throughout galaxy's history (e.g. Silk & Rees 1998, Granato et al 2004, Di Matteo et al 2005, Croton et al 2006, Hopkins et al 2008, Menci et al 2008, King 2010, Faucher-Giguère & Quataert 2012. Although the nature of this relationship is still poorly understood, there are hints that most of the SMBH accretion takes place during an obscured quasar phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%