2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/765/1/68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE BIVARIATE SIZE-LUMINOSITY RELATIONS FOR LYMAN BREAK GALAXIES ATz∼ 4-5

Abstract: We study the bivariate size-luminosity distribution of Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) selected at redshifts around 4 and 5 in GOODS and the HUDF fields. We model the size-luminosity distribution as a combination of log-normal distribution (in size) and Schechter function (in luminosity), therefore it enables a more detailed study of the selection effects. We perform extensive simulations to quantify the dropout-selection completenesses and measurement biases and uncertainties in two-dimensional size and magnitude… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
105
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
36
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 is the same as Figure 6, but for all of our galaxies. Figure 7 indicates that the r e distribu- (2006) 1333 (4694) Hathi et al (2008a) 61 ( Huang et al (2013) 1012 (1356) 4 − 5 ∼ −1 Mode SExtractor, GALFIT Ono et al (2013) 15 (81) 7 − 10 −1.30 +0.12 −0.14 Average GALFIT Curtis-Lake et al (2014) 1318 ( Table 2.…”
Section: Statistical Difference and Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 7 is the same as Figure 6, but for all of our galaxies. Figure 7 indicates that the r e distribu- (2006) 1333 (4694) Hathi et al (2008a) 61 ( Huang et al (2013) 1012 (1356) 4 − 5 ∼ −1 Mode SExtractor, GALFIT Ono et al (2013) 15 (81) 7 − 10 −1.30 +0.12 −0.14 Average GALFIT Curtis-Lake et al (2014) 1318 ( Table 2.…”
Section: Statistical Difference and Selection Biasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The α value is the slope of the r e -L UV relation. We select L 0 to the best-fit Schechter parameter M * at z ∼ 3 that corresponds to M UV = −21.0, following the arguments of Huang et al (2013).…”
Section: Size-luminosity Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Smaller galaxy sizes at lower luminosities are sometimes used to argue that lensing shear has no effect on galaxy completeness (e.g., Maizy et al 2010). However, both the mass-size and the luminosity-size relations at high redshift are found to be very shallow following r M found by Huang et al (2013). These measurements are completely consistent with the surprisingly constant size scaling for late type galaxies at all redshifts z 0 3 = -seen in the CANDELS data set (r M e 0.22 µ ; see van der Wel et al 2014) and there is no convincing evidence for a change in these scaling relations at higher redshifts (but see Grazian et al 2012).…”
Section: Assumptions About the Galaxy Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%