2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2011
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2011.6050162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The bistatic SAR experiment with ALOS / PALSAR and Pi-SAR-L

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Near-space passive SARs are considered as a typical unit with asymmetric structure in the future sensor web [3] because the altitude and velocity of a near-space vehicle is very different from those of a satellite. Spaceborne/airborne hybrid bistatic SAR [4][5][6][7], whose transmitter is spaceborne and receiver is placed on an aircraft, has a resemblance to a near-space passive SAR. However, the latter has two advantages over the former, that is, (1) wider imaging swaths introduced by the greater flying altitude of a receiver platform and (2) greater flexibility induced by the variability of the velocity of a receiver platform, ranging from approximately 5 to 3000 meters per second.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-space passive SARs are considered as a typical unit with asymmetric structure in the future sensor web [3] because the altitude and velocity of a near-space vehicle is very different from those of a satellite. Spaceborne/airborne hybrid bistatic SAR [4][5][6][7], whose transmitter is spaceborne and receiver is placed on an aircraft, has a resemblance to a near-space passive SAR. However, the latter has two advantages over the former, that is, (1) wider imaging swaths introduced by the greater flying altitude of a receiver platform and (2) greater flexibility induced by the variability of the velocity of a receiver platform, ranging from approximately 5 to 3000 meters per second.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only requirement is that at least one platform should move relative to an observation area, such that a synthetic aperture can be formed. The spaceborne platform can be a radar satellite [6][7][8], which is the most common case. Alternatively, it can be a transmitter of opportunity, such as a communications or digital television satellite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%