2006
DOI: 10.4314/smj2.v9i1.12919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The birth weight of apparently healthy Nigerian newborns in Sokoto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences in mean birth weight may be due to altitude; maternal nutrition and maternal diseases 18. However, mean birth weight of 3065 g was reported earlier in this institution 19. This was lower than the present study perhaps due to a relatively small sample size in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…These differences in mean birth weight may be due to altitude; maternal nutrition and maternal diseases 18. However, mean birth weight of 3065 g was reported earlier in this institution 19. This was lower than the present study perhaps due to a relatively small sample size in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Similarly, birth weight is an important factor associated with child morbidity and mortality as well as organic diseases during the child's adult life (Calkins and Devaskar, 2011). It is also a vital instrument for assessing the health care delivery system of a nation (Onankpa et al, 2006). Meanwhile, significant differences in normal weights at birth and weights during childhood were observed across races in a study carried out by Wilcox and colleagues (1993).…”
Section: During Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, significant differences in normal weights at birth and weights during childhood were observed across races in a study carried out by Wilcox and colleagues (1993). Moreover, within Nigeria it was for instance reported that normal child birth weights also vary from one geo-political region or ethnicity to another (Patwari et al, 1988;Onankpa et al, 2006). These disparities may not be unconnected with differences in sex of the babies, maternal race and age, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, presence of gestational diabetes and socioeconomic status (Amini et al, 1994;Onankpa et al, 2006;Ndu et al, 2014;Wilcox et al, 1993).…”
Section: During Childhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where n = sample size of each group, u = one-sided percentage point of the normal distribution corresponding to 100% power (the power of this study was 90%), v = percentage point of the normal distribution corresponding to a two-sided significance level, u1 = expected mean (hypothetic mean): mean birthweight in healthy newborns is 3.0 kg, 36 and u0 = universal mean = mean birth weight seen in the literature in sickle cell pregnancies. 37 Universal mean (u0) from the literature 38 This was rounded down to 60.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%