1997
DOI: 10.1111/1467-954x.00052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Birth of the Queen/the Modern Homosexual: Historical Explanations Revisited

Abstract: In this paper I review a number of explanations for the emergence of the modern homosexual category in Western (mainly Northwest European) cultures. I suggest there are four different emphases in respect of the social and cultural factors given priority in interpretations of the formation of the homosexual category. Of course, individual studies have often taken into consideration more than one single factor (most notably, Greenberg, 1988;Chauncey, 1994), and the grouping of previous studies that I here sugges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homogenization can be found when comparing findings of previous studies between LBMDAs' usage in the United States (Chan, 2016;Fitzpatrick et al, 2015;Miller, 2015a;Rice et al, 2012), United Kingdom (Bonner- Thompson, 2017;Miles, 2017;Mowlabocus, 2016), and Brazil (Miskolci, 2015). For example, based on these studies These similarities suggest homogenization/Americanization of gay/MSM sexualities occurred in the United Kingdom and Brazil, due to strong global flows and weak local cultural barriers (Löfström, 1997;Parker, 2003). Such a conclusion can be supported by a willingness to adopt and implement neo-liberal capitalist economic systems in all three countries, along with Western management culture and style, and a high degree of cultural openness act of investment and confirmation that can never be afforded a faceless profile" (Mowlabocus, 2016, p. 103).…”
Section: An Example Of Current Theoretical Perspectives' Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Homogenization can be found when comparing findings of previous studies between LBMDAs' usage in the United States (Chan, 2016;Fitzpatrick et al, 2015;Miller, 2015a;Rice et al, 2012), United Kingdom (Bonner- Thompson, 2017;Miles, 2017;Mowlabocus, 2016), and Brazil (Miskolci, 2015). For example, based on these studies These similarities suggest homogenization/Americanization of gay/MSM sexualities occurred in the United Kingdom and Brazil, due to strong global flows and weak local cultural barriers (Löfström, 1997;Parker, 2003). Such a conclusion can be supported by a willingness to adopt and implement neo-liberal capitalist economic systems in all three countries, along with Western management culture and style, and a high degree of cultural openness act of investment and confirmation that can never be afforded a faceless profile" (Mowlabocus, 2016, p. 103).…”
Section: An Example Of Current Theoretical Perspectives' Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These similarities suggest homogenization/Americanization of gay/MSM sexualities occurred in the United Kingdom and Brazil, due to strong global flows and weak local cultural barriers (Löfström, ; Parker, ). Such a conclusion can be supported by a willingness to adopt and implement neo‐liberal capitalist economic systems in all three countries, along with Western management culture and style, and a high degree of cultural openness (Amann & Baer, ; Kingstone, ; Saad‐Filho & Morais, ; Wolford & French, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives Of Cultural Globalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 See, for instance, Laqueur (1987Laqueur ( , 1992, Hood-Williams (1996), Hitchcock (1997), and Lofstrom (1997). 3 It is now a commonplace of philosophy that a clear distinction can be drawn between the "earlier" Wittgenstein of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1961) and the "later" work, which culminated in the Philosophical Investigations (1978).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prohibition of same sex intimacy is internalized as part of bureaucratic personality which enhances homophobic anxiety. Or the issue of the gender of a sexual partner, which was not an important matter in antiquity, and in medieval Europe, but became significant in Western culture in the 18th century (Löfström 1997).…”
Section: Institutional Heterosexism Becomes Homophobiamentioning
confidence: 99%