1988
DOI: 10.2307/1860024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Birth of the Propaganda State: Soviet Methods of Mass Mobilization, 1917-1929

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regime saw the media as danger to be tightly controlled, with only select elites permitted access to objective news or to foreign publications (Soldatov & Borogan, 2015). As such, the Soviet Union was widely acknowledged as employing strategic communication and reaping the benefits in both the domestic and the foreign realms (Glantz, 1988), as well as utilizing agitation and propaganda to mobilize its population (Kenez, 1985). Strategic communication can be defined as the use of various measures or tactics with the purpose of influencing other actors' decisions and actions to achieve policy objectives (Godzimirski & Østevik, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regime saw the media as danger to be tightly controlled, with only select elites permitted access to objective news or to foreign publications (Soldatov & Borogan, 2015). As such, the Soviet Union was widely acknowledged as employing strategic communication and reaping the benefits in both the domestic and the foreign realms (Glantz, 1988), as well as utilizing agitation and propaganda to mobilize its population (Kenez, 1985). Strategic communication can be defined as the use of various measures or tactics with the purpose of influencing other actors' decisions and actions to achieve policy objectives (Godzimirski & Østevik, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite recognizing the divergent propagandist styles available to autocratic states, the conventional assumption persists that state propaganda only takes one monolithic style and delivers desired messages in one unified tone at any given moment (Ellul, 1973; Kenez, 1985; Silverstein, 1987). Little attention has been paid to how the style of state propaganda may vary at precarious political moments, such as major policy reversals, according to the specific policy area, the level of the media venue, and the demographic composition of the targeted audience.…”
Section: Strategic Propaganda and Discursive Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Plekhanov, 1891(Plekhanov, /1983 In Plekhanov's thinking, propaganda aims to form people's opinions and attitudes, while agitation is forming people's actions (see also Kremer & Martov, 1896/1983. Agitation and propaganda were then put into practice as tools of mass mobilisation and paved the way for the rise of the "propaganda state" of the Soviet Union (Kenez, 1985). The two concepts were combined in the practice of agitprop (agitation propaganda), a concept coined in the 1920s, following the Russian Revolution, and engaging the medium of film for its purposes.…”
Section: The Rise Of Propaganda As a Phenomenon And Research Areamentioning
confidence: 99%