2007
DOI: 10.1089/elj.2006.6011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Birth and Rebirth of Election Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide range of evidence indicates that the attitudes of local government officials influence how they enforce the law (e.g., Farris and Holman 2015). The ''hyperdecentralization'' of election administration is frequently noted as an obstacle to reform (e.g., Tokaji 2007). Local officials' views toward election reforms help determine whether they embrace or resist those reforms (Moynihan and Silva 2008;Burden et al 2012).…”
Section: Why the Opinions Of Local Election Officials Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of evidence indicates that the attitudes of local government officials influence how they enforce the law (e.g., Farris and Holman 2015). The ''hyperdecentralization'' of election administration is frequently noted as an obstacle to reform (e.g., Tokaji 2007). Local officials' views toward election reforms help determine whether they embrace or resist those reforms (Moynihan and Silva 2008;Burden et al 2012).…”
Section: Why the Opinions Of Local Election Officials Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%