The Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disease

Abstract

use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Biopsychosocial risk factors and knowledge of cervical cancer among young women: A case study from Kenya to inform HPV prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…Our study is guided by Engel’s biopsychosocial risk factor model of disease that explains health outcomes as a result of an interaction between biological, social and psychological risk factors [ 27 ]. These factors can either predispose, i.e.…”

Review of the Lessons from the Mental Health Care in a Public Health Context Short Course: Australia Awards Africa

“…Another study conducted in Australia demonstrated the importance of including psychological, biological and sociocultural factors in models of body image and eating concerns in young female adolescents (Rodgers et al, 2014). Mental health complications of medical conditions is an increasingly recognised issue with implications on the quality of life (Bolton and Gillett, 2019). Considering the interaction of psychological, biological, socio-cultural factors, there is need for diagnosis and management of illness in lowmiddle income countries in Africa to consider incorporating psychological services into physical healthcare pathways.…”

Biocognitive Classification of Antisocial Individuals Without Explanatory Reductionism

“…These findings support the view that understanding psychopathy and antisocial behavior requires more fine-grained insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying aberrant behaviors, which can potentially lead to more targeted therapies to remedy the impairments. In this way, the spirit of the RDoC project can be extended to include computational considerations when devising new classifications and measures for doing research (for further extensions of RDoC, see Bolton & Gillett, 2019).…”

“…Among the problematic and imprecise concepts, they included terms such as behavioral health conditions, mental disorders , or mental health conditions because they give the impression that there is an autonomous mental substance to which mental problems pertain disconnected from its physical underpinnings. All parties to this debate seem to agree that mind and body are not really different substances and that biological factors have a role in psychiatric research (Bolton & Gillett, 2019; Borsboom et al, 2019). Nonetheless, there is a tendency to overemphasize observable behavior, subjective reports, and relations between symptoms of mental disorders that creates an artificial wedge between psychiatry and the rest of medicine (Insel & Cuthbert, 2015; White, Rickards, & Zeman, 2012).…”