2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The biomechanical influence of the facet joint orientation and the facet tropism in the lumbar spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
95
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
95
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the spine model of Kim et al, increased FJ orientation led to an elevated contact force of FJ under torsion, made the FJ more vulnerable to anterior shear forces and raised intradiscal pressure, which led to IVD degeneration. This IVD degeneration was aggravated by FT due to enhanced intradiscal pressure and anterior shear forces, which is in accordance with our results 28 . We found 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 no significant difference of gagCEST values in segments with an FJ orientation <45 and FT compared to segments with an FJ orientation >45 without FT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the spine model of Kim et al, increased FJ orientation led to an elevated contact force of FJ under torsion, made the FJ more vulnerable to anterior shear forces and raised intradiscal pressure, which led to IVD degeneration. This IVD degeneration was aggravated by FT due to enhanced intradiscal pressure and anterior shear forces, which is in accordance with our results 28 . We found 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 no significant difference of gagCEST values in segments with an FJ orientation <45 and FT compared to segments with an FJ orientation >45 without FT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding suggests that sagittal FJ orientation had no greater influence on GAG content of lumbar IVDs than FT that was reported by Boden et al who found pronounced degenerative spine changes in more sagittal FJ 10 . In contrast to the results of Boden and colleagues, Kim et al found a higher impact of FT on disc alterations compared to sagittal FJ orientation in the spine model 28 . This may be the result of the FT models used by Kim et al, which included 50 , 55 and 60 with a moderate asymmetry between left and right FJ.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A finite element analysis found that FT could make the lumbar segment vulnerable to shear force. 15 FT may have a different role in the pathology of LDH in adolescents and adults. Murtagh et al investigated the association between FT and LDH in adults, and found that FT was not a correlative factor for LDH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…28 A recent finite element research study confirmed that FT could make the corresponding segment more vulnerable to external movements or anterior shear force. 15 Therefore, FT may play a more important role in the development of LDH in adolescents than in adults. In the present study, the authors investigated the association between FT and LDH in adolescents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%