The Biomechanical Analysis of Simulating Implants in Function Under Osteoporotic Jawbone by Comparing Cylindrical, Apical Tapered, Neck Tapered, and Expandable Type Implants: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Individual scoring and mapping of hard and soft tissues of the anterior hard palate for orthodontic miniscrew insertion

“…Of importance, the cancellous layer is an overlooked issue when addressing the stability of a miniscrew. The cortical bone in contrast to the cancellous bone, is more resistant to load, has a higher modulus of elasticity, and absorbs most of the transferred load, thus is the main focus of interest for the primary stability of immediate‐loaded orthodontic‐specific miniscrews . However, it is also postulated that the cancellous layer, as the initiating point and main part of osseointegration of the orthodontic miniscrew, could play a significant role in the secondary and long‐term stability of miniscrews .…”

The Effect of Offset Implant Configuration on Bone Stress Distribution: A Systematic Review

“…So, the evaluation of this change in implant position in more unfavorable situations could provide results that differ from those found. When using the finite element method, the implants placed in a lower‐density region showed worse results in stress distribution . In this context, the effect of the offset implant placed in low‐density bone, such as the maxilla, must be tested in future studies.…”

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of implant diameter and photofunctionalization on peri-implant stress

“…However, the accuracy of FEA results depends greatly on the biomechanical equivalence (form, dimensions, boundary conditions, material properties) between the analytic model and human body. Until now, almost all FEA studies of dental implant treatment assumed a bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio of 100% (6)(7)(8). However, the BIC ratio is not 100%: the true value was reported to be 45 ± 16% in one study (9) and 40 to 70% in other studies (10,11).…”