“…The reward obtained by the pollinators from using male sexual structures, is countered by the cost of visiting deceitful, non-rewarding female sexual structures. The plant's gain in deceit is likely ovule escape from herbivory, but the cost may be pollen limitation (Norstog & Nicholls, 1997;Dufaÿ & Anstett, 2003). This mutual exploitation appears to be sufficiently stable for long-term population persistence, even when in various cycad species seed set values rarely go over 60% with many plants showing evidence of receiving few or no pollen at all (Newell, 1983;Tang, 1987a;Kono & Tobe, 2007;Lazcano Lara, 2015;Proches and Johnson, 2009;Suinyuy, Donaldson, & Johnson, 2009;Terry, 2001;Wilson, 2002).…”