1967
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1967.tb04263.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The biology of the children of Hopewood House, Bowral, N.S.W.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other workers have reported that starch can contribute to the development of caries, and that caries formation may be related to both oral clearance and enzymatic degradation of starch by salivary at-amylase (Kleinberg, 1970;Mdrmann and Mihlemann, 1981;Sreebny, 1982). However, observations of people with hereditary fructose intolerance (Newbrun, 1983) and from controlled human studies (Gustafsson et al, 1954;Harris, 1967;Scheinin et al, 1976) have shown that plaque which accumulated in the presence of little or no sucrose was, when challenged with starch, non-carnogenic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Other workers have reported that starch can contribute to the development of caries, and that caries formation may be related to both oral clearance and enzymatic degradation of starch by salivary at-amylase (Kleinberg, 1970;Mdrmann and Mihlemann, 1981;Sreebny, 1982). However, observations of people with hereditary fructose intolerance (Newbrun, 1983) and from controlled human studies (Gustafsson et al, 1954;Harris, 1967;Scheinin et al, 1976) have shown that plaque which accumulated in the presence of little or no sucrose was, when challenged with starch, non-carnogenic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Epidemiological studies in native popu lations, dietary history, observations in peo ple with hereditary fructose intolerance [for review : Newbrun, 1978] and controlled hu man studies such as those of Vipeholm [Gustafsson et al, 1954], Hopewood House [Harris, 1963] and Turku [Scheinin et al, 1975] suggest that starch consumed in the presence of a plaque raised with little or no sucrose is low or noncariogenic. However, there is evidence that the combination of starch and sucrose in a product has even a higher cariogenic potential than sucrose alone; in the Vipeholm study a significantly higher caries incidence was found in a group of men who consumed sucrose in bread compared with a group who took about the same amount of sucrose in solution, both four times daily with meals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic Vipeholm study (Gustafsson et al, 1953), the Hopewood House experiments (Harris, 1963), the Turku studies (Scheinin and Makinen, 1975), and the study of HFI individuals have been cited frequently as indicating that food starches are not cariogenic in humans (e.g., Newbrun, 1982;Beighton and Hayday, 1984;Rugg-Gunn et al, 1987). However, this interpretation has often failed to take into account critical caries factors such as frequency of sugar or starch consumption, plaque-pH-lowering potential, starch bioavailability, or starch-sugar interaction.…”
Section: Studies Of the Starch-caries Issue With Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%