2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00690.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Biological Roots of Complex Thinking: Are Heritable Attitudes More Complex?

Abstract: Are highly heritable attitudes more or less complex than less heritable attitudes? Over 2,000 participant responses on topics varying in heritability were coded for overall integrative complexity and its 2 subcomponents (dialectical complexity and elaborative complexity). Across different heritability sets drawn from 2 separate prior twin research programs, the present results yielded a consistent pattern: Heritability was always significantly positively correlated with integrative complexity. Further analyses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we originally expected that (1) terrorist groups would have lower overall integrative complexity compared to non-terrorist groups, and that (2) this would be particularly evident for dialectical forms of complexity. What we expected for elaborative complexity was less clear, but based on prior work on psychological extremism (Conway et al, 2011), we expected that (3) terrorists would show equal or potentially even higher elaborative complexity than non-terrorist groups. As we shall see, the latter expectation proved false.…”
Section: Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we originally expected that (1) terrorist groups would have lower overall integrative complexity compared to non-terrorist groups, and that (2) this would be particularly evident for dialectical forms of complexity. What we expected for elaborative complexity was less clear, but based on prior work on psychological extremism (Conway et al, 2011), we expected that (3) terrorists would show equal or potentially even higher elaborative complexity than non-terrorist groups. As we shall see, the latter expectation proved false.…”
Section: Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research on these new constructs suggests the type of complex thinking matters: Dialectical and elaborative complexity are differentially associated with psychological extremism, lying, and attitude heritability Conway, Dodds, Towgood, McClure, & Olson, 2011).…”
Section: Dialectical and Elaborative Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also evaluated if participants' Abstract Views of Torture moderated the effect of Personal Closeness on support for torture in the scenario. To do this, we used Aiken and West's (1991) highly-cited method for testing interactions between variables via regression (for exemplars, see Conway & Schaller, 2005;Conway et al, 2009;Conway, Dodds, Hands Towgood, McClure, & Olson, 2011). Specifically, we (a) converted the Personal Closeness and Abstract Views of Torture to z-scores; (b) created an interaction term by computing their product; and then (c) entered Closeness, Abstract Views, and the interaction term as predictors in a regression for each of the two DVs separately.…”
Section: Secondary Analyses Abstract Torture Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why integrative complexity? Integrative complexity has been extensively validated as a measurement of cognitive complexity differences across a number of domains (e.g., Conway & Conway, ; Conway, Conway, Gornick, & Houck, ; Conway, Dodds, Hands Towgood, McClure, & Olson, ; Conway, Suedfeld, & Tetlock, ; Conway et al, ; Conway, Gornick, et al, ; Hale, ; Houck, Conway, & Gornick, ; Suedfeld, , ; Suedfeld & Bluck, ; Suedfeld, Conway, & Eichhorn, ; Suedfeld, Leighton, & Conway, ; Suedfeld & Tetlock, ; Tetlock, , ; Thoemmes & Conway, ).…”
Section: Strategic Models Of Complexity: Different Psychological Procmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, because IC can be scored for anyone, researchers have successfully used it to understand and predict behavior in populations that are otherwise difficult to study, such as terrorists (Conway et al, ; Houck, Repke, & Conway, ; Smith, Suedfeld, Conway, & Winter, ), famous individuals (Houck, Conway, Parrow, Luce, & Salvati, ), and notable politicians (e.g. Conway et al, ; Conway, Gornick, et al, ; Conway et al, ; Gruenfeld, ; Jhangiani et al, ; Suedfeld, ; Suedfeld & Bluck, ; Suedfeld & Rank, ; Thoemmes & Conway, ).…”
Section: Strategic Models Of Complexity: Different Psychological Procmentioning
confidence: 99%