2007
DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2007.9669185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Big-Push Approach to African Development and Local Capacity Building: Understanding the Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capacity building by engagement has been used in many communities where there are inherent and long-standing challenges to sustainability (Wescott, 2002;Crabbe, 2006), for example, in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) (Chircop, 1998), and indigenous community-based conservation (Mutandwa and Gadzirayi, 2007;Tai, 2007). While many, if not all, capacity-building programmes involve building competencies and empowerment in local communities, few involve policy-makers or government officials (Mequanent and Taylor, 2007). Therefore a capacity-building exercise was undertaken around MPAs in Belize which involved both local NGO community workers and a government fisheries officer, so that community engagement could be directly interfaced with fisheries operations and policy (Crabbe et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Capacity Building To Improve Science and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacity building by engagement has been used in many communities where there are inherent and long-standing challenges to sustainability (Wescott, 2002;Crabbe, 2006), for example, in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) (Chircop, 1998), and indigenous community-based conservation (Mutandwa and Gadzirayi, 2007;Tai, 2007). While many, if not all, capacity-building programmes involve building competencies and empowerment in local communities, few involve policy-makers or government officials (Mequanent and Taylor, 2007). Therefore a capacity-building exercise was undertaken around MPAs in Belize which involved both local NGO community workers and a government fisheries officer, so that community engagement could be directly interfaced with fisheries operations and policy (Crabbe et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Capacity Building To Improve Science and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both developed and developing countries have used capacity-building programs (Eakin & Lemos, 2006;Kaplan et al 2006;Rogers et al 2007). While many, if not all, of these programs involve building competencies and empowerment in local communities, few of them involve policy makers or government officials (Mequanent & Taylor, 2007). Moreover, increased community capacity can potentially empower local communities to mitigate socioeconomic impacts of environmental change; however, evaluations of ICZM performance have revealed limited interest in furthering community development.…”
Section: Some Routes Toward Integrated Coastal Zone Management and Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both developed and developing countries have used capacitybuilding programs (Kaplan, Liu & Hannon, 2006;Rogers, Johnson, Warner, Thorson & Punch, 2007). While many, if not all, of these programs involve building competencies and empowerment in local communities, few of them involve policy makers or government officials (Mequanent & Taylor, 2007). Partnerships can be vital for ICZM, particularly where government policies link to local stakeholders (e.g., beach clean-up groups and marine wildlife associations) to produce collaborations that can involve people with vested interests in the coastal ecosystem (e.g., fishers, tour operators) and in ongoing management frameworks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%