2013
DOI: 10.3102/0002831212464511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect and a National Policy of Within-School Ability Streaming

Abstract: The big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE) was evaluated with 4,461 seventh to ninth graders in Singapore where a national policy of ability streaming is implemented. Consistent with the BFLPE, when prior achievement was controlled, students in the high-ability stream had lower English and mathematics self-concepts (ESCs and MSCs) and those in the lower-ability stream had higher ESCs and MSCs. Consistent with the local-dominance effect, the effect of stream-average achievement on ESCs and MSCs was more negative t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
8
43
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the AIC and BIC between neighborhood, classroom and school model, we find the statistical explanatory power of the classroom model to be overall better, indicating that -comparing the three context levels -most variance in the dependent variable is explained by the classroom level. This is in line with arguments from frame-of-reference theory assuming that classrooms are the most proximal context in which teachers actively operate on a daily basis (Liem et al 2013, Marsh et al 2014. Educational context 23 characteristics on all three contextual levels are modeled simultaneously in Model 5.…”
Section: Analytical Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the AIC and BIC between neighborhood, classroom and school model, we find the statistical explanatory power of the classroom model to be overall better, indicating that -comparing the three context levels -most variance in the dependent variable is explained by the classroom level. This is in line with arguments from frame-of-reference theory assuming that classrooms are the most proximal context in which teachers actively operate on a daily basis (Liem et al 2013, Marsh et al 2014. Educational context 23 characteristics on all three contextual levels are modeled simultaneously in Model 5.…”
Section: Analytical Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For the immigrant composition, we expect negative context-based stereotypes for our ethnically less segregated classroom, neighborhoods and school contexts. In line with frame-of-reference theory, classrooms are the most proximal context in which teachers actively operate on a daily basis (Liem, Marsh, Martin et al 2013, Marsh, Kuyper, Morin et al 2014). Hence, we expect theoretically that classroom conditions constitute the most salient frame.…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the other end of the spectrum, intellectually challenged students had higher academic self-concepts in a special need class than when they were placed in a mixed-ability (ungrouped) class (Chapman, 1988;Crabtree, 2003;Marsh, Tracey, & Craven, 2006). Liem et al, 2013). The plus signs refers to a positive predictive association between individual student academic achievement and academic self-concept, and the negative sign refers to a negative predictive association between context-average achievement and student academic self-concept.…”
Section: The Big-fish-little-pond Effect Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, little is known about how ordinary non‐relative adult actors impact adolescent identity formation, in the context of their larger social network. In addition, there is growing recognition that school environments might shape both adolescent self‐concept and health behaviors 11,24‐27. Understanding how school‐related adults, such as teachers and athletic coaches, might influence aspects of self‐concept linked to health behaviors may help identify potential leverage points for intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%