2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1123-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bicontact cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: long-term results

Abstract: We report on a prospective series of 201 primary uncemented total hip arthroplasties with a Bicontact prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 12.9 years. The mean Harris hip score improved from 41 before surgery to 89 at final follow-up. Two femoral stems, one each for infection and fracture, and 12 cups were revised. The mean number of years to revision post-primary surgery was 8.7 years (six months to 16 years). The cumulative survival of the prosthesis was 95.42% for any cause at ten years and 93.57% at 12 years.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Swamy et al . reported a survivorship for aseptic loosening of 100% after 12.9 years for 201 prosthesis 32 . Ochs et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swamy et al . reported a survivorship for aseptic loosening of 100% after 12.9 years for 201 prosthesis 32 . Ochs et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be assessed by direct acquisition of bone remodelling data via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), which is the gold standard in evaluating redistribution of mechanical forces and femur remodelling around the THA implant [3]. Although good long-term results with the Bicontact® stem have been published [1,2,4], it is questionable whether the implant provides the criteria for a state-of-the-art stem regarding proximal bone stock preservation. The aim of our study was to monitor the periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) after implantation of the Bicontact® stem in a prospective two-year follow-up DEXA study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the in situ protein adsorption onto two different surface structures in the same patient and for safety purposes, the Bicontact stem (Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was chosen, a long‐term established Ti‐6Al‐4V implant which is characterized be a large anchoring distance and high implant survival rates . The proximal part of the implant is covered by a 0.35 mm plasma spray layer of commercial pure Ti (cpTi) and has a microrough surface structure (Plasmapore, porosity 35%, pore size 50–200 µm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%