2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4049(02)00211-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Betti numbers of some finite racks

Abstract: We show that the lower bounds for Betti numbers given in [CJKS1] are equalities for a class of racks that includes dihedral and Alexander racks. We confirm a conjecture from the same paper by defining a splitting for the short exact sequence of quandle chain complexes. We define isomorphisms between Alexander racks of certain forms, and we also list the second and third homology groups of some dihedral and Alexander quandles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By (5), we have H R 2 (X ; Z) ∼ = Z. It is known [5,17] that, for any x ∈ X , the 2-cycle of the form…”
Section: Proofs Of Lemmas 58 and 57mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By (5), we have H R 2 (X ; Z) ∼ = Z. It is known [5,17] that, for any x ∈ X , the 2-cycle of the form…”
Section: Proofs Of Lemmas 58 and 57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the above sequence enables us to compute π 2 (B X). For several quandles X of order ≤ 9, we determine π 2 (B X) exactly (see Table 1), following the values of H Q 2 (X ; Z) and H Q 3 (X ; Z) presented in [17]. Furthermore, since Mochizuki [19,20] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the first isomorphism is derived from Remark 5.1, and the second was shown [LN,Theorem 2.2]. Composing this (28) with the result on π 2 (BX) = π 2 (B(X, X)) from Theorem 3.5 can compute some torsion of the quandle homology H Q 3 (X) [see Lemma (8.4)].…”
Section: Application To Third Quandle Homologiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a special case, if X is the Alexander quandle of order p, then H Q n (X; Z) is annihilated by p (Corollary 6.4), proving [7,Conjecture 16]. It is known [4,Theorem.1] that H Q n (X; Z) is annihilated by |X| n for a connected quandle X and each n ≥ 1. Then Corollary 6.2 is a stronger estimate for Alexander quandles, while it does not hold for a connected quandles; for example, there exists a connected non-Alexander quandle QS (6) whose third quandle homology is not annihilated by |QS(6)| (Remark 6.3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…T. Mochizuki listed all 2-cocycles for finite Alexander quandles over a finite field in [5] and all 3-cocycles for Alexander quandles on a finite field in [6]. R. A. Litherland and S. Nelson analyzed the free and torsion subgroup of the quandle homology group of a finite quandle [4]. For the quandle homology of higher degrees, M. Niebrzydowski and J. H. Przytycki constructed some quandle homological operations and estimated the torsion subgroup of the integral quandle homology groups of some quandles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%