2001
DOI: 10.1186/2048-4623-1-s3-pb057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Better Births Initiative: South Africa pilot study report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Richard et al (2008) [ 39 ] Interviews Doctors (gynaecologist/obstetricians; other), midwives (35 participants) Audit (facility-based case reviews) [ 36 ] (intervention type f) Burkina Faso Hospital (26 bed obstetric unit in a district hospital in Ouagadougou) (7.) Smith et al (2004) [ 40 ] FGD, interviews Labour ward staff (14 participants)) Educational intervention (better births initiative—targets practices where there is good evidence from systematic reviews of benefits or harm) [ 41 ] (intervention types a and b) South Africa Hospital (10 government maternity units in Gauteng) (8.) Van Hamersveld et al (2012) [ 42 ] Interviews, participant observation (of audit sessions) Doctors (obstetrician; paediatricians; other), midwives (23 participants) Audit (type of audit not specifically stated—includes critical incident audit/maternal death reviews) [ 36 ] (intervention type f) Tanzania Hospital (1 district hospital with approximately 5000 deliveries annually in Morogoro region) (9.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Richard et al (2008) [ 39 ] Interviews Doctors (gynaecologist/obstetricians; other), midwives (35 participants) Audit (facility-based case reviews) [ 36 ] (intervention type f) Burkina Faso Hospital (26 bed obstetric unit in a district hospital in Ouagadougou) (7.) Smith et al (2004) [ 40 ] FGD, interviews Labour ward staff (14 participants)) Educational intervention (better births initiative—targets practices where there is good evidence from systematic reviews of benefits or harm) [ 41 ] (intervention types a and b) South Africa Hospital (10 government maternity units in Gauteng) (8.) Van Hamersveld et al (2012) [ 42 ] Interviews, participant observation (of audit sessions) Doctors (obstetrician; paediatricians; other), midwives (23 participants) Audit (type of audit not specifically stated—includes critical incident audit/maternal death reviews) [ 36 ] (intervention type f) Tanzania Hospital (1 district hospital with approximately 5000 deliveries annually in Morogoro region) (9.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These recommendations are difficult to fulfill in African maternity wards, where outdated obstetric practices, such as perineal shaving, episiotomy, enemas, and birth in the supine position, are still routine in many settings. Supportive companions are rarely allowed, and due to staff shortages, women often remain alone and uncomforted during labor 16 . Such practices will hopefully begin to change for all women as PMTCT programs promote evidence‐based practice and encourage midwives and facilities to assess and improve labor and delivery care.…”
Section: Prevention Of Mother To Child Transmission Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%