2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1004_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Best of Both Worlds: Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data Using Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
76
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that using polychoric correlations in factor analysis may be a substantial improvement, but may not fully overcome the base rate dependence of using dichotomous data. Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modelling for dichotomous data have also been proposed as alternative approaches for factor analysis of dichotomous items (Glockner-Rist & Hoijtink, 2003;Yang, Lu, & Qiao, 2014).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that using polychoric correlations in factor analysis may be a substantial improvement, but may not fully overcome the base rate dependence of using dichotomous data. Item Response Theory and Structural Equation Modelling for dichotomous data have also been proposed as alternative approaches for factor analysis of dichotomous items (Glockner-Rist & Hoijtink, 2003;Yang, Lu, & Qiao, 2014).…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on the relationship between the FA and IRT frameworks showed that the unidimensional two-parameter normal ogive IRT model is equivalent to a onefactor FA model when binary manifest variables are predicted by a continuous latent variable (e.g., Brown 2006;Ferrando and Lorenzo-Seva 2005;Glöckner-Rist and Hoijtink 2003;MacIntosh and Hashim 2003;Takane and de Leeuw 1987). The two-parameter normal ogive IRT model can be written as…”
Section: Irt and Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Brown (2006) noted, the use of the FA model provides greater analytic flexibility than the IRT framework because traditional IRT models can be embedded within a larger model that includes additional variables to explain the item parameters as well as the latent trait (e.g., Glöckner-Rist and Hoijtink 2003;Lu et al 2005). Using the structural equation modeling (SEM) framework, an IRT model can be defined as a measurement model in which there is a latent trait (e.g., reading ability) underlying a set of manifest variables (e.g., dichotomous items in a reading assessment).…”
Section: Modeling Position Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the methods discussed in this study were applied to dichotomous data. The majority of the IRT models handle dichotomous data (Hambleton & Swaminathan, 1985, p.34): 1 for correct response and 0 for incorrect response (Glöckner-Rist & Hoijtink, 2003).…”
Section: Common Assumptions and Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%