2014
DOI: 10.2175/193864714815940938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Best Carbon for the Job: Using the 2010 WERF Protocol to Choose an External Carbon Alternative for Enhanced Nitrate Removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On-site testing and process modeling pointed to the same cause of incomplete denitrification: a carbon limitation in the anoxic zones of the WWTF's MLE process (see Sigmon et al, 2014). The use of data from an online TOC Analyzer allowed the City of Boulder WWTF to demonstrate that the diurnal patterns of carbon and nitrogen were offset enough to contribute to the WWTF's carbon limitation.…”
Section: Methods and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-site testing and process modeling pointed to the same cause of incomplete denitrification: a carbon limitation in the anoxic zones of the WWTF's MLE process (see Sigmon et al, 2014). The use of data from an online TOC Analyzer allowed the City of Boulder WWTF to demonstrate that the diurnal patterns of carbon and nitrogen were offset enough to contribute to the WWTF's carbon limitation.…”
Section: Methods and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%