This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. This is a short nomenclatural note on the place of publication of Monanthesia and the lectotypification of Bennettites.© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.The name Monanthesia was introduced by Wieland (1934) for columnar bennettitalean stems with fructifications from the Upper Cretaceous of New Mexico (USA). In later years Monanthesia has also been described from the Lower and Upper Cretaceous of other parts of the world and additional species were recognized. However, the status of the name Monanthesia has long been a point of discussion, especially since Delevoryas (1959) regarded the name Monanthesia as invalidly published by Wieland (1934) and gave a new diagnosis. Most authors followed Delevoryas and refer to it as 'Monanthesia Wieland 1934 ex Delevoryas', e.g., Watson and Sincock (1992), Saiki and Yoshida (1999), Rothwell and Stockey (2002), and Watson and Lydon (2004). However, we are of a different opinion.Our first conclusion is that Delevoryas cannot be considered to have validated this name, because he had four species of which he thought he validly published the new name/a new combination. All this is, however, without designation of the type of the generic name, thus not fulfilling Art. 40.1 and 40.6 of the Melbourne Code (McNeill et al., 2012).Moreover, it does not appear to be necessary to start a search for the later validation of Monanthesia -thorough reading of Wieland's original publication revealed that this generic name was validly published in 1934! The only problem is that the generic diagnosis is not presented under a clear heading, but 'hidden' in the long text. On p. 94, Wieland (1934) gave a list of the occurrence "of Cycadeoids with flowers, fruits or flower-stalks in all the frond base axillae" (as such spaced by Wieland): six combinations in Cycadeoidea (occurring in N. America and Italy), followed by two in Monanthesia (M. blanca and M. magnifica from New Mexico). In the subsequent paragraph, this is stated: "The first six specimens 1 of this remarkable group to be recovered are known only from single isolated occurrences. But the forms from New Mexico include a varied and splendid series now well under way of elaboration. … In any case the cauliflorous types with fructifications in all frond axillae, have become a most imposing group, whether taken geographically, or geologically. Perhaps all the species should be included in some genus of convenience like the Monanthesia." Wieland was careful, placing in Monanthesia only the two species from New Mexico that were new and that he could well investigate: M. blanca and M. magnifica. In his textfig. 20 (to p. 115), a photograph of M....